Landlord Wins Eviction Case: Neupane v Purser 2022
LTB Rules on Oshawa Eviction: Neupane v Purser Case Study
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 22, 2024
Case Summary
1027 Southport Dr, Oshawa, ON L1H8A2
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Aug 2022
Order Date
Aug 26, 2022
Tenancy End Date
Nov 2022
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant because the Landlords require possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation.
Determinations
- Eviction postponed until November 30, 2022 to give Tenant time to find a new place to reside
- Landlords currently in contravention of Oshawa municipal by-law, but municipality not in a hurry to force compliance
- Landlords in good faith require possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation
Case Study
The Tenant intends to return to her matrimonial home, which is involved in family court litigation. The Tenant is currently looking for another place to rent. The Landlords currently reside in the unit upstairs and intend to reside in the entire home once the Tenant vacates. The Landlords are in violation of a City of Oshawa by-law, and the Tenant's unit is an illegal dwelling.
Decision Summary
The tenancy is terminated effective November 30, 2022. The Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before November 30, 2022. The Tenant shall pay the Landlord $36.49 per day for compensation for the use of the unit from December 01, 2022, to the date the Tenant moves out. If the unit is not vacated on or before November 30, 2022, the Landlord may file the order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) so that the eviction may be enforced.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
253
Landlord Favorable
85.8%
Tenant Favorable
8.3%
Mutual Agreement
5.9%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.