Sorge v Bedard
Last updated: August 9, 2026
Order
Decision in favor of
Landlord
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Citation: Sorge v Bedard, LTB-T-008579-25, 2026 ONLTB 42096
File Number: LTB-T-008579-25
Timeline
Application Date
Jan 2025
Hearing Date
May 2026
Order Date
May 29, 2026
Decision
The Tenant's application regarding illegal entry and substantial interference was dismissed as it was filed more than one year after the incidents occurred.
Dispute
The Tenant applied for a determination that the Landlord entered the rental unit illegally and substantially interfered with the Tenant's reasonable enjoyment. The application was dismissed because the claims were time-barred under the Act.
Determinations
- The Tenant moved out of the rental unit on or before January 31, 2024.
- The Tenant filed her application on January 31, 2025.
- Pursuant to subsection 29(2) of the Act, all issues are time-barred as they occurred more than one year prior to filing.
Landlord's Arguments
Considerations
Tenant's Arguments
Actions and Evidence
The Tenant alleged illegal entry and interference, but these claims were found to be outside the one-year limitation period.
Considerations
Need assistance from an expert?
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for interference and safety concerns was withdrawn, and the file was closed.
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for interference and safety concerns was withdrawn, and the file was closed.
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for interference and safety concerns was withdrawn, and the file was closed.
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for interference and safety concerns was withdrawn, and the file was closed.
Patterson v Ghuman
Tenant's applications for harassment and maintenance were dismissed due to insufficient information in the filing and because the tenancy had already ended.
Amore v Malleum Real Estate Management Corp.
The Tenant's application regarding maintenance and harassment was withdrawn at their request, and the LTB file was closed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
Tian v Keshvari
The Landlord's application for termination was denied, and the Tenant was ordered to pay for a thermostat replacement, while the Tenant's cross-applications were dismissed.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Do You Need a Lawyer or Paralegal for the LTB? A Cost-Benefit Guide for Ontario Landlords and Tenants
Should you hire a lawyer or paralegal for your Landlord and Tenant Board case? Compare representation costs, LTB fee recovery limits, and when self-representation makes sense for Ontario rental disputes.
The Deposit Dilemma: Understanding Ontario's Rules on Security Deposits, Key Deposits, and Last Month's Rent
A comprehensive guide to Ontario's deposit laws, exploring what landlords can and cannot collect, common violations, and real LTB cases showing how deposit disputes are resolved.
Tenant Harassment and Illegal Entry: Understanding Your Rights and Remedies Under Ontario Law
A comprehensive guide to tenant rights regarding harassment and illegal entry in Ontario, exploring what constitutes violations, how the LTB evaluates these claims, and the remedies available to protect tenants from landlord misconduct.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform