Patterson v Ghuman
Last updated: August 9, 2026
Order
Decision in favor of
Landlord
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Citation: Patterson v Ghuman, LTB-T-008210-25
File Number: LTB-T-008210-25
Timeline
Hearing Date
May 2026
Order Date
May 29, 2026
Decision
Tenant applications (T2 and T6) dismissed. T2 dismissed for procedural lack of particulars; T6 dismissed as moot given the tenancy ended and the Tenant vacated.
Dispute
Tenant filed applications (T2, T6) alleging harassment, interference, and maintenance failures. The Landlord and Tenant attended the hearing. The T2 was dismissed due to lack of specificity in the application. The T6 was dismissed because the Tenant had already vacated the unit and the tenancy was terminated.
Determinations
- Tenant's T2 application dismissed for lack of particulars.
- Tenant's T6 application dismissed as issues are moot due to the Tenant vacating the unit and tenancy termination.
Landlord's Arguments
Considerations
Tenant's Arguments
Actions and Evidence
The Tenant admitted at the hearing that the application omitted specific dates and times of the alleged events.
Procedural Errors
Failed to provide specific dates and times of incidents in the application, violating the requirement to give the Landlord notice of the case to be met.
Considerations
Need assistance from an expert?
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Telles v 1689 Victoria Park Residences Ltd
The Tenant withdrew their application alleging harassment against the Landlord during the Case Conference.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Telles v 1689 Victoria Park Residences Ltd
The Tenant withdrew their application alleging harassment against the Landlord during the Case Conference.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Telles v 1689 Victoria Park Residences Ltd
The Tenant withdrew their application alleging harassment against the Landlord during the Case Conference.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Telles v 1689 Victoria Park Residences Ltd
The Tenant withdrew their application alleging harassment against the Landlord during the Case Conference.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for interference and safety concerns was withdrawn, and the file was closed.
Mahindru v Floras
The Landlord was awarded rent arrears after the Board dismissed the Tenant's maintenance and harassment claims.
Amore v Malleum Real Estate Management Corp.
The Tenant's application regarding maintenance and harassment was withdrawn at their request, and the LTB file was closed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

The Digital Divide: How Technology is Changing LTB Proceedings and Access to Justice
Explore how the shift to virtual hearings and digital processes at the LTB is creating new challenges and opportunities for access to justice. Learn about technological barriers, procedural fairness issues, and what parties need to know about navigating digital proceedings.

London, Ontario Tenant Paralegals: How to Find LTB Representation and Defend Your Rights (2026)
Facing eviction or landlord harassment in London, Ontario? Learn what tenant paralegals do at the LTB, when to hire one, and meet Southwestern Ontario advocates ranked by real tribunal records.

The N5 Notice Filing Guide: Avoiding Critical Errors That Doom Substantial Interference Cases in Ontario
Master the N5 Notice to End Tenancy for Substantial Interference with this comprehensive guide covering proper completion, timing requirements, and costly mistakes that lead to dismissed applications at the LTB.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform
