Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk
Last updated: August 9, 2026
Order
Decision in favor of
Landlord
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Citation: Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk, LTB-L-076659-25
File Number: LTB-L-076659-25
Timeline
Order Date
May 29, 2026
Hearing Date
Jun 2026
Decision
The Landlord's application is withdrawn by request; the file is closed.
Dispute
The Landlord filed an application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to substantial interference and safety concerns. The Landlord later requested to withdraw the application.
Determinations
- The Landlord withdrew the L2 application.
- The hearing is cancelled and the file is closed.
Landlord's Arguments
Actions and Evidence
The Landlord submitted a request to withdraw the L2 application.
Considerations
Tenant's Arguments
Considerations
Need assistance from an expert?
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Cityhousing Hamilton Corporation v Wilson-Oddi
The LTB terminated the tenancy due to the Tenant's violent assault against other residents and refusal to cease vigilante activity.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Cityhousing Hamilton Corporation v Wilson-Oddi
The LTB terminated the tenancy due to the Tenant's violent assault against other residents and refusal to cease vigilante activity.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Cityhousing Hamilton Corporation v Wilson-Oddi
The LTB terminated the tenancy due to the Tenant's violent assault against other residents and refusal to cease vigilante activity.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Cityhousing Hamilton Corporation v Wilson-Oddi
The LTB terminated the tenancy due to the Tenant's violent assault against other residents and refusal to cease vigilante activity.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
Collingwood Non Profit Housing Corporation v Hunter
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was granted because the Tenant committed an assault on the property manager during a lawful entry attempt and refused to permit future entry.
Patterson v Ghuman
Tenant's applications for harassment and maintenance were dismissed due to insufficient information in the filing and because the tenancy had already ended.
Amore v Malleum Real Estate Management Corp.
The Tenant's application regarding maintenance and harassment was withdrawn at their request, and the LTB file was closed.
12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
A review order was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The N11 Agreement Trap: When 'Mutual' Terminations Aren't Really Mutual in Ontario
Exploring how N11 agreements are often signed under duress or misunderstanding, leading to disputes about whether terminations were truly voluntary and the legal standards for challenging these agreements.
How to Enforce an LTB Payment Order in Ontario Small Claims Court (2026 Guide)
Won money at the LTB but nobody paid? Learn how Ontario landlords and tenants register tribunal orders in Small Claims Court, use garnishment, debtor examinations, and writs of seizure to collect.
The Digital Divide: How Technology is Changing LTB Proceedings and Access to Justice
Explore how the shift to virtual hearings and digital processes at the LTB is creating new challenges and opportunities for access to justice. Learn about technological barriers, procedural fairness issues, and what parties need to know about navigating digital proceedings.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform