Harassment - LTB Orders
Disputes involving harassment or threats by either landlords or tenants.
Related Forms
Dispute Stats
Total Orders
3,903
Orders since 2024
2,327
Contested dispute only. Click to switch between order outcomes
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Twaseen v Zhang
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.
C***** Barrientos v Sherritt
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's T2 application for substantial interference, maintenance failures, and harassment after finding the allegations unproven.
Celik v Celik
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application because the Residential Tenancies Act did not apply due to the shared use of kitchen and bathroom facilities with the landlord and the landlord's mother.
Irwin v 869797 Ontario Limited
A tenant's harassment application was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit and her request to amend remedies was refused.
Engel v Waterloo Regional Housing
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment because the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities.
Ferk v Ottawa Community Housing Corporation
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's review request, finding no serious error or denial of procedural fairness in the original order concerning maintenance and tenant rights.
Webster v 1100 MS W Inc.
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment concerning maintenance issues and an N5 notice.
Irwin v 869797 Ontario Limited
A tenant's harassment application was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit and her request to amend remedies was refused.
Engel v Waterloo Regional Housing
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment because the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities.
Ferk v Ottawa Community Housing Corporation
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's review request, finding no serious error or denial of procedural fairness in the original order concerning maintenance and tenant rights.
Webster v 1100 MS W Inc.
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment concerning maintenance issues and an N5 notice.
Irwin v 869797 Ontario Limited
A tenant's harassment application was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit and her request to amend remedies was refused.
Engel v Waterloo Regional Housing
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment because the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities.
Ferk v Ottawa Community Housing Corporation
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's review request, finding no serious error or denial of procedural fairness in the original order concerning maintenance and tenant rights.
Webster v 1100 MS W Inc.
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment concerning maintenance issues and an N5 notice.
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Twaseen v Zhang
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.
Irwin v 869797 Ontario Limited
A tenant's harassment application was dismissed as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit and her request to amend remedies was refused.
Engel v Waterloo Regional Housing
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment because the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities.
Ferk v Ottawa Community Housing Corporation
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's review request, finding no serious error or denial of procedural fairness in the original order concerning maintenance and tenant rights.
Webster v 1100 MS W Inc.
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment concerning maintenance issues and an N5 notice.
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Twaseen v Zhang
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.
C***** Barrientos v Sherritt
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's T2 application for substantial interference, maintenance failures, and harassment after finding the allegations unproven.
Celik v Celik
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application because the Residential Tenancies Act did not apply due to the shared use of kitchen and bathroom facilities with the landlord and the landlord's mother.
Unlock Complete Case History
Access our complete database of similar cases to build stronger arguments and increase your chances of success at the Landlord Tenant Board.
See how adjudicators typically rule on cases similar to yours
Access complete case histories to strengthen your position
Reference specific past orders during your hearing
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

When Landlords Cry Wolf: Analyzing False Claims and Bad Faith Applications at the LTB
A comprehensive analysis of dismissed landlord applications, bad faith eviction attempts, and frivolous claims reveals the consequences when property owners abuse the LTB system.

Utility Billing Disputes and Illegal Charges: Understanding Your Rights in Ontario's Rental Market
An in-depth analysis of utility billing disputes at Ontario's LTB reveals common overcharging practices, jurisdictional limitations, and the financial consequences for both landlords and tenants when utility agreements go wrong.

How to Enforce an LTB Payment Order in Ontario Small Claims Court (2026 Guide)
Won money at the LTB but nobody paid? Learn how Ontario landlords and tenants register tribunal orders in Small Claims Court, use garnishment, debtor examinations, and writs of seizure to collect.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform
