12008491 Canada Inc. and T****** Beatrice Kalima
Last updated: August 9, 2026
Order
Decision in favor of
Landlord
Previous Order
Upheld
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Citation: 12008491 Canada Inc. v. Kalima
File Number: LTB-L-086156-25
Timeline
Hearing Date
May 2026
Order Date
May 29, 2026
Decision
The request for review was denied as the Tenant had vacated the unit, making the eviction order moot.
Dispute
The Tenant requested a review of an order for termination and eviction based on substantial interference and damage. Prior to the review hearing, the Tenant vacated the rental unit, rendering the review request moot.
Determinations
- The Tenant confirmed they had vacated the rental unit.
- The review request was dismissed as moot.
Landlord's Arguments
Considerations
Tenant's Arguments
Considerations
Need assistance from an expert?
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
12008491 Canada Inc. v Kalima
The Tenant's request for review of an eviction order was dismissed because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for interference and safety concerns was withdrawn, and the file was closed.
Patterson v Ghuman
Tenant's applications for harassment and maintenance were dismissed due to insufficient information in the filing and because the tenancy had already ended.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for interference and safety concerns was withdrawn, and the file was closed.
Patterson v Ghuman
Tenant's applications for harassment and maintenance were dismissed due to insufficient information in the filing and because the tenancy had already ended.
Amore v Malleum Real Estate Management Corp.
The Tenant's application regarding maintenance and harassment was withdrawn at their request, and the LTB file was closed.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for interference and safety concerns was withdrawn, and the file was closed.
Patterson v Ghuman
Tenant's applications for harassment and maintenance were dismissed due to insufficient information in the filing and because the tenancy had already ended.
Amore v Malleum Real Estate Management Corp.
The Tenant's application regarding maintenance and harassment was withdrawn at their request, and the LTB file was closed.
Lang v Neely
The Landlord was granted a conditional eviction order after proving substantial interference by the Tenant and their guests, though claims of property damage were dismissed.
Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Petroniuk
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for interference and safety concerns was withdrawn, and the file was closed.
Patterson v Ghuman
Tenant's applications for harassment and maintenance were dismissed due to insufficient information in the filing and because the tenancy had already ended.
Amore v Malleum Real Estate Management Corp.
The Tenant's application regarding maintenance and harassment was withdrawn at their request, and the LTB file was closed.
Kingsway A Limited v Ramachandran
The Landlord's application for eviction due to property damage was successful, but the Tenant was granted relief on the condition of paying for repair costs in installments.
The Tenant's review request was denied after the member found the original order was reasonable and the Tenant had failed to serve their evidence in accordance with procedural rules.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The N11 Agreement Trap: When 'Mutual' Terminations Aren't Really Mutual in Ontario
Exploring how N11 agreements are often signed under duress or misunderstanding, leading to disputes about whether terminations were truly voluntary and the legal standards for challenging these agreements.
How to Enforce an LTB Payment Order in Ontario Small Claims Court (2026 Guide)
Won money at the LTB but nobody paid? Learn how Ontario landlords and tenants register tribunal orders in Small Claims Court, use garnishment, debtor examinations, and writs of seizure to collect.
The Digital Divide: How Technology is Changing LTB Proceedings and Access to Justice
Explore how the shift to virtual hearings and digital processes at the LTB is creating new challenges and opportunities for access to justice. Learn about technological barriers, procedural fairness issues, and what parties need to know about navigating digital proceedings.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform