Landlord Wins Non-payment Case: Tridico v Beaird 2024
Sault Ste Marie tenants evicted for non-payment of rent, owe $661 to landlord
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 13, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 39 Albert Street East, Sault Ste Marie, ON P6A2H7
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$661
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Jan 2023
Hearing Date
Mar 2024
Order Date
Mar 25, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Apr 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to failure to pay rent and other issues like substantial interference, damage to property, illegal acts, and safety impairment. The Landlords served various notices, including N4, N5, N6, and N7 notices.
Determinations
- Landlords served valid N4 Notice
- Tenants did not void N4 notice by paying arrears
- Tenants still in possession on application date
- Lawful rent of $1,000 due on 1st of each month
- Rent arrears of $1,000 as of hearing date
- Landlords incurred $201 in application filing fees
- No last month's rent deposit
- Relief from eviction not granted
Case Study
The Landlord's notices were found to be invalid due to lack of specificity in the details and descriptions of the alleged conduct. The Landlord's L2 application for damages was dismissed due to lack of evidence. The Landlord's L1 application for non-payment of rent was granted, and the tenancy was terminated unless the Tenants voided the order by paying the outstanding rent and fees.
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Procedural Errors
Landlords' notices were found to be invalid due to lack of specificity in the details and descriptions of the alleged conduct.
Tenant
Actions
Tenants vacated the rental unit on August 4, 2022, without paying full rent arrears.
Decision Summary
The Landlords' L2 application for damages was dismissed due to lack of evidence. The Landlords' L1 application for non-payment of rent was granted. The tenancy is terminated unless the Tenants void the order by paying $1,201 by March 31, 2024, or $2,201 by April 5, 2024. If the Tenants do not void the order, they must pay the Landlords $661.32 and vacate the unit by April 5, 2024.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
58
Landlord Favorable
89.7%
Tenant Favorable
8.6%
Mutual Agreement
1.7%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,000
Rent Arrears
$1,000
Application Fee
$201
Damages
$2,000
Total Owing
$661 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.