ET v LW

Last updated: July 30, 2024

Share:

Order

Ordered by ,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: September 15, 2015
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Tenant

ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: ET v LW, 2015 CanLII 76625 (ON LTB)

File Number: TNT-71482-15

Timeline

Application Date

May 2015

3 months

Hearing Date

Aug 2015

1 months

Order Date

Sep 15, 2015

Decision

The Landlord is ordered to pay the Tenant a rent abatement of $300 for harassment and substantial interference. The Landlord is prohibited from sending the Tenant any threatening or insulting correspondence.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Tenant filed an application alleging that the Landlord harassed and substantially interfered with the Tenant's reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit through threatening phone calls and text messages, as well as requiring the Tenant to clean common areas.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Rental unit is a room in a rooming house
  • Landlord's communications on May 4 and May 12, 2015 constituted harassment and substantial interference
  • Tenant entitled to $300 rent abatement for harassment and substantial interference
  • Landlord responsible for cleaning common areas, not Tenant
  • Landlord's service of N12 notice did not constitute harassment or substantial interference
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord argued that the Tenant's recording of a conversation between the Landlord and another tenant was obtained improperly and should not be considered.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord agreed that the transcripts of phone calls and text messages provided by Tenant were accurate.

Unlock Order Content

Procedural Errors

Landlord served a defective N12 notice with an incorrect termination date.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant argued that Landlord's communications and requirement to clean common areas constituted harassment and substantial interference.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant provided transcripts of phone calls and text messages from Landlord, which the Landlord agreed were accurate. Tenant also testified about being required to clean common areas.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Loading similar cases...
Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform