Marcelline v Xiao and Yan

Last updated: July 26, 2024

Order

Ordered by Laura Hartslief,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: January 18, 2021
Unit ***, 527 Danforth Road, Scarborough, ON M1K1C8
Contested Dispute

Dispute resolved in

Agreement

Dispute Categories

ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Marcelline v Xiao and Yan, 2021 CanLII 69686 (ON LTB)

File Number: TET-05872-19-RV

Timeline

Application Date

Nov 2019

14 months

Hearing Date

Jan 2021

6 days

Order Date

Jan 18, 2021

Decision

The Landlords' request for review is granted. The order is cancelled and replaced with an order adjourning the matter to a date to be set by the Board to hear the merits of the Tenant's application.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Tenant applied for an order determining that Landlords failed to meet their maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 or failed to comply with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards. The application was resolved by order TET-05872-19 issued on November 20, 2019. The Landlords requested a review of the order, stating they were not reasonably able to participate in the hearing that occurred on November 18, 2019.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • The Tenant's application is amended to include Zhizhong Yan as a named Landlord.
  • The Landlords' request to review order TET-05872-19 issued on November 20, 2019 is granted.
  • The order is cancelled and replaced with an order adjourning the matter to a date to be set by the Board to hear the merits of the Tenant's application.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Tenant's Arguments

Procedural Errors

The Tenant did not provide the Landlords' complete mailing address to the Board when she filed her application, so the notice of hearing was not properly mailed to the Landlords' address.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

McConnell v Torbill Holdings Ltd.

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Picton

Tenant's maintenance application dismissed by LTB for being too vague and failing to provide details for over a year.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Mamycheva v 1000976838 ONTARIO INC.

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Huntsville

Huntsville tenants' harassment claims against a new landlord were dismissed as the landlord's actions were deemed reasonable for safety and administration.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Lucic-Tadic v Halton Community Housing Corporation

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 12, 2026
Oakville

Tenant's maintenance and enjoyment claims were dismissed because the application failed to clearly state the legal grounds and specific facts of the dispute.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Belisa v Mackinnon

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 7, 2026
Chatham
Review Order

Chatham landlord confirmed to evict tenants owing over $19,000 after review hearing.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Permitted
ContentionExtreme

McConnell v Torbill Holdings Ltd.

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Picton

Tenant's maintenance application dismissed by LTB for being too vague and failing to provide details for over a year.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Mamycheva v 1000976838 ONTARIO INC.

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Huntsville

Huntsville tenants' harassment claims against a new landlord were dismissed as the landlord's actions were deemed reasonable for safety and administration.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Lucic-Tadic v Halton Community Housing Corporation

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 12, 2026
Oakville

Tenant's maintenance and enjoyment claims were dismissed because the application failed to clearly state the legal grounds and specific facts of the dispute.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Belisa v Mackinnon

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 7, 2026
Chatham
Review Order

Chatham landlord confirmed to evict tenants owing over $19,000 after review hearing.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Permitted
ContentionExtreme

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform