Lau v Mordchaev

Last updated: October 13, 2024

Share:

Order

Ordered by Kate Sinipostolova,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: August 21, 2024
Unit ***, 31 Tippett Rd, North York, ON M3H0C8
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Tenant

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Damage to Property (N5)
ContentionModerate

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Lau v Mordchaev, 2024 ONLTB 60703

File Number: LTB-L-068436-23

Timeline

Application Date

Aug 2023

9 months

Hearing Date

May 2024

4 months

Order Date

Aug 21, 2024

Decision

The Landlord's application is dismissed. The Landlord did not prove the Tenant, another occupant, or someone the Tenant permitted caused the flood damage to the rental unit. The Tenant's testimony and evidence were found more credible than the Landlord's hearsay evidence.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to the Tenant allegedly causing significant damage to the rental unit through a flood. The Landlord claimed the Tenant was negligent in not notifying the Landlord about the running toilet that caused the flood.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlord served valid N5 Notice
  • Tenant did not void notice by repairing damage or making arrangements
  • Tenant was in possession on application date
  • Flood occurred in rental unit on 2023-06-24
  • Tenant notified Landlord of flood incident
  • Tenant made reasonable efforts to mitigate damage
  • Landlord incurred costs to repair damage
  • Landlord did not prove Tenant, occupant, or guest caused damage
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant was negligent in not notifying Landlord about running toilet that caused flood, resulting in significant damage.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Flood was not Tenant's fault, but due to systemic plumbing issues in the building. Presented evidence of other units experiencing similar floods.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant left unit to get a haircut, returned to find unit flooded. Turned off water, cleaned up, and immediately notified Landlord.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Kingsway A Limited v Ramachandran

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 29, 2026
ETOBICOKE

The Landlord's application for eviction due to property damage was successful, but the Tenant was granted relief on the condition of paying for repair costs in installments.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Spakowski v Hogan

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Board terminated the tenancy for personal use by the purchaser but dismissed the Landlord's damage claim.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

WHITBY CHRISTIAN NON- PROFIT HOUSING v MCGHEE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
April 13, 2026
WHITBY

The Landlord was awarded a payment order for damages to a rental unit caused by the Tenant.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

Fahimnia v Sobati

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB terminated the tenancy due to rent arrears and property damage, and dismissed the tenant's maintenance and harassment claims.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Permitted
ContentionExtreme

WHITBY CHRISTIAN NON- PROFIT HOUSING v MCGHEE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
April 13, 2026
WHITBY

The Landlord was awarded a payment order for damages to a rental unit caused by the Tenant.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

Fahimnia v Sobati

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB terminated the tenancy due to rent arrears and property damage, and dismissed the tenant's maintenance and harassment claims.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Permitted
ContentionExtreme

Abbiento v Opalinski

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Landlord's application for eviction was dismissed regarding interference but granted for property damage, with the Tenant ordered to pay costs to maintain the tenancy.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Landlord Sent Invalid Notice
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Tobis Investments Inc. v Little

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 5, 2026
Toronto

The Board granted the Landlord's application to terminate for damage but allowed the Tenant to maintain their long-term tenancy via an installment repayment plan for repair costs.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform