Spakowski v Hogan

Last updated: August 9, 2026

Share:

Order

Order Date: May 25, 2026
*** Alpine Avenue, Thunder Bay, ON P7E3L4
Contested Dispute
Application L2Filed by LandlordDocument Order

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Notices Sent

Personal Use (N12)Damage to Property (N5)

Subsections of RTA Quoted

21248(2)49(1)62(1)83(1)83(2)
ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Spakowski v Hogan, LTB-L-101293-25, 2026 ONLTB 27841

File Number: LTB-L-101293-25

Timeline

Hearing Date

Mar 2026

2 months

Order Date

May 25, 2026

11 days

Tenancy End Date

Jun 2026

Decision

The application to terminate the tenancy for personal use is granted. The damage claim is dismissed. The Tenant is ordered to vacate by June 5, 2026 and pay the Landlord $7,004.58 in compensation.

Unlock Order Content

Reason for Eviction Relief

The Purchaser established hardship in being unable to occupy the unit.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for personal use by the purchaser and for damage to the rental unit. The Tenant contested the validity of the N12 notice and the damage claim.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • The N12 notice is valid as it substantially complied with the Act and did not prejudice the Tenant.
  • The Purchaser in good faith requires the unit for residential occupation.
  • The Landlord failed to prove the damage claim was undue or wilful/negligent.
  • Relief from eviction was denied due to the hardship of the Purchaser.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord argued the purchaser requires the unit for good-faith occupation.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord claimed Tenant damaged the door and wall; provided an estimate for door replacement.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant argued the N12 notice was defective due to a date error and insufficient notice time.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant alleged the door was inherently problematic and repaired it himself.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Kingsway A Limited v Ramachandran

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 29, 2026
ETOBICOKE

The Landlord's application for eviction due to property damage was successful, but the Tenant was granted relief on the condition of paying for repair costs in installments.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Krikorova v Clark

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Landlord's application for personal use eviction was granted, with an extension provided to the Tenant for medical reasons.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Chen v Siele

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The tenancy is terminated due to the Tenant's substantial interference with the Landlord's right to access for repairs and the Landlord's good faith requirement for personal use.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Ally v Lalanne

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB terminated the tenancy for personal use while granting the Tenant an extension until July 31, 2026, to vacate the unit.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Kingsway A Limited v Ramachandran

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 29, 2026
ETOBICOKE

The Landlord's application for eviction due to property damage was successful, but the Tenant was granted relief on the condition of paying for repair costs in installments.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Krikorova v Clark

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Landlord's application for personal use eviction was granted, with an extension provided to the Tenant for medical reasons.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Chen v Siele

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The tenancy is terminated due to the Tenant's substantial interference with the Landlord's right to access for repairs and the Landlord's good faith requirement for personal use.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Ally v Lalanne

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB terminated the tenancy for personal use while granting the Tenant an extension until July 31, 2026, to vacate the unit.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform