Skyline Living v Cojocar - Landlord Wins Eviction Case for Illegal Act
Windsor landlord successfully evicts tenant for illegal act of entering another tenant's unit without permission
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 13, 2024
Case Summary
707 Langlois Ave, Windsor, ON N9A6Y2
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$736
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Feb 2024
Order Date
Mar 11, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Mar 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to allegations of the Tenant committing an illegal act and seriously impairing the safety of others in the residential complex.
Determinations
- Landlord proved grounds for termination of tenancy based on illegal act
- Tenant was in possession of rental unit on application and hearing dates
- N6 and N7 notices were properly served
- Text messages did not constitute illegal act or serious safety impairment
- Tenant's entry into another tenant's unit was an illegal act
- Insufficient evidence to prove serious impairment of safety
- Landlord entitled to daily compensation and damage costs
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Actions
Tenant entered another tenant's unit without permission, was found unconscious and covered in urine and vomit on their bed.
Aggravating Factors
Tenant's actions were part of a larger pattern of unsettling behaviour, including general disturbances, noise complaints, and police being called to the complex. Other tenants felt intimidated by the Tenant.
Decision Summary
The Landlord proved the grounds for termination of the tenancy based on the Tenant committing an illegal act by entering another tenant's unit without permission. The Tenant is ordered to vacate the unit by March 16, 2024 and pay the Landlord $736.35 in compensation, damages, and application fees.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
28
Landlord Favorable
78.6%
Tenant Favorable
17.9%
Mutual Agreement
3.6%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$868
Application Fee
$186
Rent Deposit
$780
Deposit Interest
$34
Damages
$1,364
Total Owing
$736 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.