Landlord Wins Review Order: Singh v Gray 2024
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 14, 2024
Case Summary
35 Rolling Mills Rd, Toronto, ON M5A0V6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Previous Order
Upheld
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Order Date
Oct 22, 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to non-payment of rent. The application was resolved by a consent order issued on October 4, 2024. Tenant Siobhan Gray requested a review of the order, stating that they did not fully understand what they were agreeing to, felt intimidated during the process, and did not have prior legal advice.
Determinations
- The order that the Tenant Siobhan Gray seeks to review is a consent order.
- The Tenant's request for review does not establish grounds to set aside the consent order.
- The Tenant participated in mediation and consented to the order that was issued.
- The order accurately reflects the terms agreed upon by the parties.
- The Tenant's disagreement with the terms of the order does not mean that the Board made a serious error.
Case Study
The order that the Tenant Siobhan Gray seeks to review is a consent order. The Tenant's request for review does not establish grounds to set aside the consent order, such as common mistake, misrepresentation, fraud or other grounds that would invalidate a contract. The Tenant participated in mediation and consented to the order that was issued, and the order accurately reflects the terms agreed upon by the parties. The Tenant's disagreement with the terms of the order does not mean that the Board made a serious error.
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Arguments
The Tenant states that they did not fully understand what they were agreeing to, felt intimidated during the process, and did not have prior legal advice.
Decision Summary
The review request is denied. The order issued on October 4, 2024 is confirmed and remains unchanged.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
437
Landlord Favorable
96.1%
Tenant Favorable
2.5%
Mutual Agreement
1.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.
Karaiskakis v Hazelview Properties Inc.
LTB dismisses tenant's claim of substantial interference due to noise from other tenants, finding landlord took reasonable steps to address complaints.