Landlord Withdraws Eviction Application: Ruysam v Tenn-Yuk 2024
Landlord withdraws LTB application for eviction due to alleged property damage in Hamilton rental dispute
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 27, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 590 Main Street East, Hamilton, ON L8M1J6
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Jun 2024
Order Date
Jul 25, 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for termination of tenancy and eviction due to willful damage caused by Tenants or their guests. Landlord also claimed compensation for each day Tenants remained after termination date and sought payment for out-of-pocket expenses resulting from Tenants' conduct that substantially interfered with Landlord's reasonable enjoyment or lawful rights.
Determinations
- Landlord requested to withdraw the application
- Member consented to the withdrawal request
- LTB file closed due to application withdrawal
Case Study
The Landlord sought to withdraw the application at the hearing, which was consented to by the Member. As a result, no further legal analysis was conducted.
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Actions
Landlord sought to withdraw the application at the hearing.
Tenant
Actions
Tenants were accused of willfully causing undue damage to the premises and substantially interfering with the Landlord's reasonable enjoyment or lawful rights.
Procedural Errors
Tenants did not attend the hearing.
Decision Summary
The Landlord's application was withdrawn at the hearing with the consent of the Member. As a result, the LTB file was closed without any further action or decision.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
616
Landlord Favorable
90.9%
Tenant Favorable
5.0%
Mutual Agreement
4.1%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.