RentZen Logo

Jagger Benham

Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions

Overview

Total Orders

658

Orders since 2024

75

Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant since 2024

24

Landlord's Notice Found Invalid since 2024

6

Hearing to Order
27days
Order to Termination
11days

Order Outcomes
PRO

Contested disputes are those where both parties were present at the hearing

PRO
Landlord Wins
30 orders60%
Tenant Wins
30 orders30%
Agreement
30 orders10%

Subscribe to view detailed win rates

Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 24 Orders since 2024
PRO

1175326 Ontario Ltd v Altounjian

Reason for Relief

Tenant may void order by paying $2,171.14 by August 25, 2024

Who Wins

Agreement

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord
Find More with Pro Search

Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions

Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours

Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument

Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 6 Orders since 2024
PRO

Chang Whan (Mark) Chun v Kristian Forster

Decision Summary

The Tenant shall pay the Landlords $9,976.30, which includes rent arrears owing up to May 31, 2023 and the cost of the application. If the Tenant does not pay the full amount by June 20, 2023, the Tenant will start to owe interest at 6.00% annually on the outstanding balance.

Who Wins

Landlord

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord
Find More with Pro Search

Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions

Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours

Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument

Contested Dispute by Category
PRO

    • Property Damage13

      Landlord Win Rate: 84.62%

    • Other12

      Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%

    • Breach Of Conditions11

      Landlord Win Rate: 45.45%

    • Maintenance Issues11

      Landlord Win Rate: 18.18%

    • Bad Faith Eviction7

      Landlord Win Rate: 42.86%

    • Harassment6

      Landlord Win Rate: 16.67%

    Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions

    Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

    Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours

    Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

    Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument

    Latest Orders

    PRO

    PASTE PROPERTIES ONTARIO LTD v FLEURY

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    February 20, 2025
    Bancroft
    Review Order

    LTB upholds eviction order against Bancroft tenant for breach of conditions, despite tenant's request for review.

    ContentionModerate
    0
    0
    Read more

    Tsenis v Mitchell

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    January 28, 2025
    Scarborough

    Scarborough tenant faces eviction for tampering with gas meter, ordered to pay $306 in costs and damages.

    Eviction Relief Granted
    Section 82 Issues Raised and Permitted
    ContentionExtreme
    0
    0
    Read more

    Robinson v McQuiggin

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    January 17, 2025
    Hamilton

    Landlord awarded $9,132.92 in compensation from unauthorized occupant in Hamilton rental dispute.

    Eviction Relief Granted
    ContentionModerate
    0
    0
    Read more

    Reid v Friend

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    January 15, 2025
    Windsor

    Windsor tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, owes $537.59.

    Eviction Relief Granted
    Section 82 Issues Raised and Permitted
    ContentionLow
    0
    0
    Read more

    Morrish v Collins

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    January 7, 2025
    Toronto
    Review Order

    Toronto landlord regains possession for personal use, tenant owes $1,302.02.

    ContentionLow
    0
    0
    Read more

    Dhimiter v Niazi Holdings Inc.

    Contested Dispute
    Neither
    December 23, 2024
    Etobicoke
    Review Order

    LTB denies tenant's request to review order terminating tenancy and evicting tenant in Dhimiter v Niazi Holdings Inc.

    ContentionModerate
    0
    0
    Read more

    Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions

    Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

    Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours

    Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

    Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument