Jagger Benham
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
658
75
24
6
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 24 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 6 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Property Damage13
Landlord Win Rate: 84.62%
- Other12
Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%
- Breach Of Conditions11
Landlord Win Rate: 45.45%
- Maintenance Issues11
Landlord Win Rate: 18.18%
- Bad Faith Eviction7
Landlord Win Rate: 42.86%
- Harassment6
Landlord Win Rate: 16.67%
Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
PASTE PROPERTIES ONTARIO LTD v FLEURY
LTB upholds eviction order against Bancroft tenant for breach of conditions, despite tenant's request for review.
Tsenis v Mitchell
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for tampering with gas meter, ordered to pay $306 in costs and damages.
Landlord awarded $9,132.92 in compensation from unauthorized occupant in Hamilton rental dispute.
Windsor tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, owes $537.59.
Toronto landlord regains possession for personal use, tenant owes $1,302.02.
Dhimiter v Niazi Holdings Inc.
LTB denies tenant's request to review order terminating tenancy and evicting tenant in Dhimiter v Niazi Holdings Inc.
PASTE PROPERTIES ONTARIO LTD v FLEURY
LTB upholds eviction order against Bancroft tenant for breach of conditions, despite tenant's request for review.
Tsenis v Mitchell
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for tampering with gas meter, ordered to pay $306 in costs and damages.
Landlord awarded $9,132.92 in compensation from unauthorized occupant in Hamilton rental dispute.
Windsor tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, owes $537.59.
Toronto landlord regains possession for personal use, tenant owes $1,302.02.
Dhimiter v Niazi Holdings Inc.
LTB denies tenant's request to review order terminating tenancy and evicting tenant in Dhimiter v Niazi Holdings Inc.
PASTE PROPERTIES ONTARIO LTD v FLEURY
LTB upholds eviction order against Bancroft tenant for breach of conditions, despite tenant's request for review.
Tsenis v Mitchell
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for tampering with gas meter, ordered to pay $306 in costs and damages.
Landlord awarded $9,132.92 in compensation from unauthorized occupant in Hamilton rental dispute.
Windsor tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, owes $537.59.
Toronto landlord regains possession for personal use, tenant owes $1,302.02.
Dhimiter v Niazi Holdings Inc.
LTB denies tenant's request to review order terminating tenancy and evicting tenant in Dhimiter v Niazi Holdings Inc.
PASTE PROPERTIES ONTARIO LTD v FLEURY
LTB upholds eviction order against Bancroft tenant for breach of conditions, despite tenant's request for review.
Tsenis v Mitchell
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for tampering with gas meter, ordered to pay $306 in costs and damages.
Landlord awarded $9,132.92 in compensation from unauthorized occupant in Hamilton rental dispute.
Windsor tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, owes $537.59.
Toronto landlord regains possession for personal use, tenant owes $1,302.02.
Dhimiter v Niazi Holdings Inc.
LTB denies tenant's request to review order terminating tenancy and evicting tenant in Dhimiter v Niazi Holdings Inc.
Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument