Maracle v Lyons

Last updated: March 1, 2026

Order

Ordered by Renée Lang,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 21.2, Statutory Powers Procedure Act and the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006

Order Date: January 2, 2026
Unit ***, 501 Montrose Road, Quinte West, ON K8R1B2
Contested Dispute
Review Order

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Previous Order

Upheld

Subsections of RTA Quoted

21.2
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Maracle v Lyons, 2026 ONLTB 2209

File Number: LTB-T-048525-22-RV

Timeline

Order Date

Jan 2, 2026

Decision

The request for a review of the order dated September 3, 2025, is denied. The original order, which dismissed the Tenant's application against the Landlord, is confirmed and remains unchanged. The Tenant failed to demonstrate any serious error in the original adjudicator's findings.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

The Tenant requested a review of an order dated September 3, 2025, which dismissed her claims regarding illegal entry, substantial interference with enjoyment, and harassment by the Landlord. The Tenant alleged that the Member failed to properly weigh evidence including camera footage of entries, noise logs regarding the Landlord's girlfriend, and an incident involving a friend of the Landlord shining lights into her window. The Tenant also alleged bias by the adjudicator.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Tenant provided video evidence of entries but failed to provide crucial details such as dates and total count.
  • Tenant's testimony regarding noise from the Landlord's girlfriend was unsupported and did not meet the burden of proof against the Landlord's denial.
  • Landlord's responsibility for a friend shining lights was not established as there was no evidence the Landlord endorsed the conduct.
  • Adjudicator's conclusion that multiple videos of music sounded like the same occasion was reasonable.
  • No facts were provided to support a reasonable apprehension of bias.
  • No serious error in the order or proceedings was identified.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

The Landlord relied on the burden of proof, asserting that the Tenant's claims were unsupported by evidence beyond her own testimony.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

The Landlord denied the allegations of noise and illegal entry, and denied knowledge of any third party shining lights into the Tenant's windows.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

The Tenant argued that the Member erred by ignoring her specific testimony regarding illegal entries captured on camera and noise disturbances, and further alleged that the Member exhibited bias in favor of the Landlord.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

The Tenant submitted videos of the Landlord entering the unit and playing loud music, and testified that the Landlord's girlfriend was 'stomping, dragging her feet and slamming doors' on multiple dates in August 2022.

Unlock Order Content

Procedural Errors

The Tenant failed to provide specific dates and times for the alleged entries shown in video evidence.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Loading similar cases...
Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform