London and Middlesex Community Housing v Muma
Last updated: August 8, 2025
Order
Ordered by Joshua Labbe,Tribunals Ontario under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Dispute resolved in
Agreement
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Citation: London and Middlesex Community Housing v Muma, 2025 ONLTB 30602
File Number: LTB-L-101057-24
Timeline
Hearing Date
Apr 2025
Order Date
May 1, 2025
Decision
The tenancy is to continue on the condition that from April 9, 2025, to October 9, 2026, the Tenant ensures all dogs (his or his guests') are muzzled in common areas of the residential complex. A breach of this condition allows the Landlord to apply for eviction without notice. The Tenant is also ordered to pay the Landlord's $186.00 application fee by June 30, 2025.
Reason for Eviction Relief
Agreement between the parties.
Dispute
The Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy, alleging substantial interference and that the Tenant's actions seriously impaired safety. The parties reached an agreement at the hearing, resulting in a conditional order where the tenancy continues.
Determinations
- Parties reached a consent agreement.
- Tenant is responsible for the actions of their guests.
- Tenancy to continue under conditions.
Landlord's Arguments
Arguments
The Landlord sought termination of the tenancy due to the Tenant's alleged actions which impaired the safety and reasonable enjoyment of others in the residential complex.
Actions and Evidence
The Landlord filed an application to evict the Tenant based on allegations of substantial interference and impaired safety related to the Tenant, their guests, or pets.
Tenant's Arguments
Arguments
The Tenant, with support, attended the hearing and consented to a conditional order to maintain the tenancy.
Actions and Evidence
The Tenant was alleged to have substantially interfered with others' enjoyment and impaired safety, leading to the application. The Tenant agreed to a condition requiring their dogs and guests' dogs to be muzzled in common areas.
Considerations
The allegations leading to the application were substantial interference and impaired safety, likely involving the Tenant's dog(s) or guests' dog(s).
Need assistance from an expert?
Similar Cases
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Brampton LTB Paralegals for Landlords: How to Find the Right Legal Help (2026 Guide)
Need a landlord paralegal in Brampton? Learn what licensed paralegals do at the LTB, how they help with evictions and rent arrears, and meet Peel Region professionals ranked by real case records.
Brampton Tenant Paralegals: How to Find LTB Representation and Defend Your Rights (2026)
Facing eviction or landlord harassment in Brampton? Learn what tenant paralegals do at the LTB, when to hire one, and meet Peel Region advocates ranked by real tribunal records.
London, Ontario LTB Paralegals for Landlords: How to Find the Right Legal Help (2026 Guide)
Need a landlord paralegal in London, Ontario? Learn what licensed paralegals do at the LTB, how they help with evictions and rent arrears, and meet Southwestern Ontario professionals ranked by real case records.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform