Holder v Victoria-Shuter Non-Profit Housing Corporation - 2024 LTB Case
Toronto tenant wins LTB case against non-profit landlord over parking fees and maintenance issues
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 3, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 80 Dundas St E, Toronto, ON M5B2P5
Decision in favor of
tenant
Balance Owed to Tenant
$48
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Mar 2024
Hearing Date
Jun 2024
Order Date
Jun 28, 2024
Dispute Summary
Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of their household; and, harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant; and for an order that the Landlord failed to meet the Landlord's maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
Determinations
- Tenant brought a T6 Application and a T2 Application
- Tenant has resided in the rental unit for close to 15 years
- Tenant was allocated a parking spot and paid the monthly parking rate
- Landlord served a Form N2 notice increasing rent to $896.87
- Tenant paid the lower rent amount in February 2024
- Landlord threatened to re-allocate Tenant's parking spot and tow vehicle
- Landlord's conduct threatened or interfered with the Tenant and substantially interfered with the Tenant's reasonable enjoyment
- Tenant's T6 application related to damage to vehicle due to malfunctioning garage door
- Landlord promptly arranged to fix the garage door after the incident
Decision Summary
The Landlord shall not threaten or interfere with the Tenant and shall not substantially interfered with the Tenant's reasonable enjoyment of the residential complex. The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $48.00 for the cost of filing the application. The Landlord shall pay the Tenant the full amount owing by July 9, 2024. If the Landlord does not pay the Tenant the full amount owing by July 9, 2024, the Landlord will owe interest at 7.00% annually on the balance outstanding.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
417
Landlord Favorable
83.2%
Tenant Favorable
12.9%
Mutual Agreement
3.8%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$48
Total Owing
$48 (Owed to Tenant)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.