Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Member Past Decisions
418
24
7
3
Showing most recent decisions
LTB dismisses landlord's application to evict tenant for personal use due to invalid termination date on N12 notice.
Toronto tenant evicted for deliberate flooding and hoarding, causing substantial property damage and pest issues.
Toronto landlord wins $8,819.62 in non-payment case, tenant faces eviction.
Landlord wins personal use eviction in Hamilton, but tenant granted delayed eviction to find new housing.
Landlord wins personal use eviction in Hamilton, but tenant granted delayed eviction to find new housing.
Toronto landlord wins $8,819.62 in non-payment case, tenant faces eviction.
Toronto tenant evicted for deliberate flooding and hoarding, causing substantial property damage and pest issues.
LTB dismisses landlord's application to evict tenant for personal use due to invalid termination date on N12 notice.
Landlord wins personal use eviction in Hamilton, but tenant granted delayed eviction to find new housing.
Toronto landlord wins $8,819.62 in non-payment case, tenant faces eviction.
Toronto tenant evicted for deliberate flooding and hoarding, causing substantial property damage and pest issues.
LTB dismisses landlord's application to evict tenant for personal use due to invalid termination date on N12 notice.
Landlord wins personal use eviction in Hamilton, but tenant granted delayed eviction to find new housing.
Toronto landlord wins $8,819.62 in non-payment case, tenant faces eviction.
Toronto tenant evicted for deliberate flooding and hoarding, causing substantial property damage and pest issues.
LTB dismisses landlord's application to evict tenant for personal use due to invalid termination date on N12 notice.
LTB dismisses landlord's application to evict tenant for personal use due to invalid termination date on N12 notice.
Toronto tenant evicted for deliberate flooding and hoarding, causing substantial property damage and pest issues.
Landlord wins personal use eviction in Hamilton, but tenant granted delayed eviction to find new housing.
Toronto landlord wins $8,819.62 in non-payment case, tenant faces eviction.
Toronto tenant evicted for deliberate flooding and hoarding, causing substantial property damage and pest issues.
LTB dismisses landlord's application to evict tenant for personal use due to invalid termination date on N12 notice.
LTB dismisses landlord's application to evict tenant for personal use due to invalid termination date on N12 notice.
Toronto tenant evicted for deliberate flooding and hoarding, causing substantial property damage and pest issues.
Toronto landlord wins $8,819.62 in non-payment case, tenant faces eviction.
Landlord wins personal use eviction in Hamilton, but tenant granted delayed eviction to find new housing.
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Landlord Win Rate: 29.41%
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
Landlord Win Rate: 75%
Landlord Win Rate: 54.55%
Landlord Win Rate: 37.5%
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument