Landlord Wins Breach of Conditions Case: Aady Holdings Ltd v Ryan 2023
Chatham tenant evicted for breach of LTB order, owes $745 plus daily compensation
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
Case Summary
3 71 St Anthony St, Chatham, ON N7M3Y2
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$745
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Order Date
Sep 21, 2023
Tenancy End Date
Oct 2023
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant, and for an order to have the Tenant pay compensation for damage they owe because the Tenant did not meet a condition specified in the order issued by the LTB on August 16, 2023 with respect to application LTB-L-069527-22.
Determinations
- Tenant did not pay lawful rent due on September 1, 2023
- Landlord entitled to request compensation for damage
- Tenant owes $744.58 for unpaid compensation from previous order
- Tenant owes $24.94 per day for compensation for use of unit starting September 22, 2023
Case Study
The order provides that the Landlord can apply to the LTB under section 78 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 without notice to the Tenant to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant if the Tenant does not meet certain condition(s) in the order. The Tenant has not met the condition to pay the lawful rent as it became due on or before September 1, 2023. The Landlord is entitled to request an order for compensation for damage.
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated. The Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before October 2, 2023. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord $744.58 for unpaid compensation for damage, and $24.94 per day for compensation for the use of the unit starting September 22, 2023 to the date the Tenant moves out of the unit.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
580
Landlord Favorable
94.1%
Tenant Favorable
0.3%
Mutual Agreement
5.5%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Damages
$745
Total Owing
$745 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.