Landlord Wins Harassment Case: Tucker v Polkowska 2022
Etobicoke landlord wins harassment case, tenant ordered to pay $50 application fee
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 22, 2024
Case Summary
104 Stephen Drive West, Etobicoke, ON M8Y3N3
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Tenant
$50
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Feb 2019
Tenancy End Date
Nov 2020
Hearing Date
Oct 2021
Order Date
Feb 8, 2022
Dispute Summary
Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord or the Landlord's agent/daughter harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant, entered the rental unit illegally, and withheld or deliberately interfered with the reasonable supply of a vital service under the tenancy agreement.
Determinations
- Landlord to pay Tenant $50 for application fee
- Tenancy terminated as of November 30, 2020
Case Study
Since the Tenant has vacated the rental unit as of November 30, 2020, the remedies being sought are redundant and moot.
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant was terminated as of November 30, 2020, the date the Tenant moved out of the rental unit. The Landlord is ordered to pay the Tenant $50.00 for the cost of filing the application.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
610
Landlord Favorable
84.3%
Tenant Favorable
8.7%
Mutual Agreement
7.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$50
Total Owing
$50 (Owed to Tenant)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.