Landlord Wins Eviction Case Against Tenant Accused of Theft - Strategic Growth Realty Group Inc v Kerr
Landlord wins eviction case against tenant accused of theft in Sault Ste. Marie
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 26, 2024
Case Summary
110 Breton Road, Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6B1B1
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Sep 2021
Order Date
Oct 5, 2021
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant because the Tenant or another occupant of the rental unit has committed an illegal act or has carried out, or permitted someone to carry out an illegal trade, business or occupation in the rental unit or the residential complex; and because the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or a person the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has seriously impaired the safety of any person.
Determinations
- Landlord's property manager identified Tenant as person committing theft
- Tenant denied involvement but provided no other details
- Tenant had opportunity to present evidence and challenge Landlord's case
- No evidence of denial of natural justice or serious error in original order
Case Study
The Tenant's request for review was denied. The presiding Member found that the Tenant was reasonably able to participate in the hearing and that there was no serious error in the original order. The Tenant's claims about the charges being dropped and his non-involvement in the theft were not supported by evidence and could not be re-argued in the review.
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Arguments
Tenant claimed charges were being dropped and he was not involved in theft
Actions
Tenant denied involvement in theft but provided no other details
Decision Summary
The request to review the original order was denied. The original order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant remains unchanged.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
640
Landlord Favorable
89.4%
Tenant Favorable
4.2%
Mutual Agreement
6.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.