Landlord Wins Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants: Piotrowicz v Arencibia
LTB Evicts Unauthorized Occupants in Cambridge Rental Case
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 22, 2024
Case Summary
93 Oak Street, Cambridge, ON N1R4L3
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Oct 2022
Order Date
Oct 31, 2022
Tenancy End Date
Nov 2022
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant because the Tenant transferred the occupancy of the rental unit to Unauthorized Occupants in a manner that was not authorized by the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
Determinations
- Landlord purchased property and assumed responsibility for evicting Unauthorized Occupants
- Tenant transferred occupancy to Unauthorized Occupants in an unauthorized manner
- Unauthorized Occupants have caused extensive damage and used property as a drug den
- Unauthorized Occupants were in possession on the application date
- Unauthorized Occupants' claims of tenancy agreement not credible
Case Study
The Unauthorized Occupants were not credible in their claims of having a tenancy agreement with the previous owner. The Landlord purchased the property and assumed responsibility for evicting the Unauthorized Occupants. The Unauthorized Occupants have caused extensive damage to the property and used it as a drug den, which justifies not granting relief from eviction.
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated as of November 5, 2022. The Unauthorized Occupants shall move out of the rental unit on or before November 5, 2022. If the unit is not vacated by that date, the Landlord may file the order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) for enforcement.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
502
Landlord Favorable
90.2%
Tenant Favorable
4.8%
Mutual Agreement
5.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.