Landlord and Tenant Reach Agreement on Parking Violation - Old Oak Properties Inc v Gerliep
Landlord and tenant reach agreement on parking violation at rental property
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 26, 2024
Case Summary
109 Proudfoot Lane, London, ON N6H4R6
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed to Landlord
$186
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Jan 2020
Hearing Date
Feb 2021
Order Date
Mar 18, 2021
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to Tenant parking in visitor parking spots. The parties consented to an order with conditions.
Determinations
- Tenant shall refrain from parking in visitor spots for 12 months
- Landlord may apply to terminate tenancy if Tenant breaches condition
- Tenant shall pay Landlord $186 application fee by August 31, 2021
- Interest of 3% annually will accrue on unpaid amounts after September 1, 2021
Case Study
The parties reached an agreement, and the Landlord was granted the right to apply for an order terminating the tenancy if the Tenant breaches the condition regarding parking in visitor spots.
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Actions
Tenant was parking in visitor parking spots, in breach of the tenancy agreement.
Decision Summary
The parties consented to an order that the Tenant shall refrain from parking in visitor spots for 12 months, and the Landlord may apply to terminate the tenancy if the Tenant breaches this condition. The Tenant shall pay the Landlord's $186 application fee by August 31, 2021, with 3% annual interest accruing on any unpaid amounts after September 1, 2021.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
10
Landlord Favorable
60.0%
Tenant Favorable
0.0%
Mutual Agreement
40.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$186
Total Owing
$186 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.