Kiani v Kadhem: Tenant Interference and Damage Case Review Denied
Hamilton landlord's eviction order for tenant interference and property damage upheld after tenant moves out
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 22, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 128 John St N, Hamilton, ON L8R1H6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Jun 2023
Order Date
Aug 28, 2023
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for termination and eviction due to Tenant's substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and willful or negligent damage to premises. The original order was issued on November 21, 2022. Tenant requested a review on January 4, 2023, which was stayed. At the review hearing, Tenant withdrew the request as they had moved out.
Determinations
- Tenant moved out of the rental unit
- Tenant requested to withdraw the review request
Case Study
The Tenant's request for review was denied as they had already moved out of the rental unit. The original order remains unchanged, confirming the Landlord's position.
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Actions
Landlord applied for termination and eviction due to Tenant's substantial interference and damage to premises.
Tenant
Actions
Tenant moved out of the rental unit and requested to withdraw the review request.
Decision Summary
The request to review the original order (LTB-L-007211-22) issued on November 21, 2022, is denied. The original order is confirmed and remains unchanged. The interim order issued on January 4, 2023, is cancelled, and the stay of the original order is lifted immediately.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
470
Landlord Favorable
96.2%
Tenant Favorable
3.2%
Mutual Agreement
0.6%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.