Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
28
28
8
2
Showing most recent decisions
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against disruptive tenant who must vacate by December 8, 2024.
LTB dismisses landlord's eviction application due to lack of evidence that successor landlord authorized former landlord to collect rent arrears.
LTB dismisses landlord's eviction application due to lack of evidence that successor landlord authorized former landlord to collect rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against disruptive tenant who must vacate by December 8, 2024.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
LTB dismisses landlord's eviction application due to lack of evidence that successor landlord authorized former landlord to collect rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against disruptive tenant who must vacate by December 8, 2024.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
LTB dismisses landlord's eviction application due to lack of evidence that successor landlord authorized former landlord to collect rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against disruptive tenant who must vacate by December 8, 2024.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
LTB dismisses landlord's eviction application due to lack of evidence that successor landlord authorized former landlord to collect rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against disruptive tenant who must vacate by December 8, 2024.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against disruptive tenant who must vacate by December 8, 2024.
LTB dismisses landlord's eviction application due to lack of evidence that successor landlord authorized former landlord to collect rent arrears.
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Tiffany Ticky typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Tiffany Ticky typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Tiffany Ticky typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
Landlord Win Rate: 0%
Landlord Win Rate: 0%
Landlord Win Rate: 0%
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Tiffany Ticky typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument