Tiffany Ticky
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
33
33
9
2
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 9 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Tiffany Ticky's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Tiffany Ticky typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 2 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Tiffany Ticky's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Tiffany Ticky typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Maintenance Issues3
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
- Substantial Interference3
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
- Harassment2
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
- Illegal Charges1
Landlord Win Rate: 0%
- Other1
Landlord Win Rate: 0%
- Persistent Late Payment1
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
Unlock Full Access to Tiffany Ticky's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Tiffany Ticky typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Sun v Rose
Unionville tenants face eviction for non-payment of utilities, ordered to pay $6,347.60 to landlord.
Yadav, Chaudhary and Fernandes v Krassilskiy and Ahmatov
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
Ringare Investments Limited v Shanahan
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against disruptive tenant who must vacate by December 8, 2024.
LTB dismisses landlord's eviction application due to lack of evidence that successor landlord authorized former landlord to collect rent arrears.
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, but gets delayed move-out date.
Sun v Rose
Unionville tenants face eviction for non-payment of utilities, ordered to pay $6,347.60 to landlord.
Yadav, Chaudhary and Fernandes v Krassilskiy and Ahmatov
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
Ringare Investments Limited v Shanahan
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against disruptive tenant who must vacate by December 8, 2024.
LTB dismisses landlord's eviction application due to lack of evidence that successor landlord authorized former landlord to collect rent arrears.
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, but gets delayed move-out date.
Sun v Rose
Unionville tenants face eviction for non-payment of utilities, ordered to pay $6,347.60 to landlord.
Yadav, Chaudhary and Fernandes v Krassilskiy and Ahmatov
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
Ringare Investments Limited v Shanahan
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against disruptive tenant who must vacate by December 8, 2024.
LTB dismisses landlord's eviction application due to lack of evidence that successor landlord authorized former landlord to collect rent arrears.
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, but gets delayed move-out date.
Sun v Rose
Unionville tenants face eviction for non-payment of utilities, ordered to pay $6,347.60 to landlord.
Yadav, Chaudhary and Fernandes v Krassilskiy and Ahmatov
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to resolve dispute over substantial interference with landlord's ability to sell rental property in Thornhill.
Etobicoke tenants face eviction for non-payment of $18,448.52 in rent.
Ringare Investments Limited v Shanahan
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against disruptive tenant who must vacate by December 8, 2024.
LTB dismisses landlord's eviction application due to lack of evidence that successor landlord authorized former landlord to collect rent arrears.
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, but gets delayed move-out date.
Unlock Full Access to Tiffany Ticky's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Tiffany Ticky typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument