RentZen Logo

Curtis Begg

Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions

Overview

Total Orders

391

Orders since 2024

35

Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant since 2024

10

Landlord's Notice Found Invalid since 2024

3

Hearing to Order
43days
Order to Termination
11days

Order Outcomes
PRO

Contested disputes are those where both parties were present at the hearing

PRO
Landlord Wins
30 orders60%
Tenant Wins
30 orders30%
Agreement
30 orders10%

Subscribe to view detailed win rates

Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 10 Orders since 2024
PRO

Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation v Gooding

Reason for Relief

The Tenant is living in subsidized housing for seniors and has lived in the rental unit since 2020, so the adjudicator granted the Tenant some time to find alternative accommodations.

Who Wins

Landlord

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord
Find More with Pro Search

Unlock Full Access to Curtis Begg's Decisions

Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

Gain insights on how Curtis Begg typically rules on cases like yours

Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument

Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 3 Orders since 2024
PRO

Igor Vassor v Mercedesz Kovacs

Decision Summary

The Landlord is awarded $11,001, which includes the rent arrears up to the hearing date and the application filing costs. If the Tenant does not pay the full amount by May 26, 2023, the Tenant will owe interest on the outstanding balance.

Who Wins

Landlord

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord
Find More with Pro Search

Unlock Full Access to Curtis Begg's Decisions

Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

Gain insights on how Curtis Begg typically rules on cases like yours

Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument

Contested Dispute by Category
PRO

    • Persistent Late Payment5

      Landlord Win Rate: 80%

    • Harassment4

      Landlord Win Rate: 25%

    • Maintenance Issues4

      Landlord Win Rate: 75%

    • Other4

      Landlord Win Rate: 100%

    • Property Damage4

      Landlord Win Rate: 75%

    • Bad Faith Eviction3

      Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%

    Unlock Full Access to Curtis Begg's Decisions

    Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

    Gain insights on how Curtis Begg typically rules on cases like yours

    Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

    Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument

    Latest Orders

    PRO

    SCHEBESCH v STROUD

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    December 20, 2024
    Thunder Bay

    Thunder Bay tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $9,737 in rent, ordered to pay $7,261.22.

    Eviction Relief Granted
    ContentionModerate
    0
    0
    Read more

    Glover v Kelly

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    November 28, 2024
    Nestleton Station

    Nestleton Station tenants face eviction for $13,373.16 in unpaid rent, given until December 31 to vacate.

    Landlord Aggravating Factor
    Tenant Aggravating Factor
    Eviction Relief Granted
    ContentionHigh
    0
    0
    Read more

    Glendale Properties Inc. v William

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    November 1, 2024
    Toronto

    Toronto landlord wins eviction order against tenant for persistent late rent payments.

    ContentionModerate
    0
    0
    Read more

    Tshilolo v Dolbeck

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    October 30, 2024
    St Catharines

    St. Catharines tenant faces eviction for persistent late payment of rent, ordered to pay $186 in costs.

    ContentionHigh
    0
    0
    Read more

    Reddy v Lee

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    October 28, 2024
    Caledonia

    Caledonia tenants face eviction for failing to pay utility charges, ordered to pay $186 in filing fees.

    ContentionModerate
    0
    0
    Read more

    Albin v Michele

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    October 8, 2024
    Mississauga

    Mississauga landlord awarded $17,927.93 and tenant faces eviction for damages, late rent, and non-payment.

    ContentionExtreme
    0
    0
    Read more

    Unlock Full Access to Curtis Begg's Decisions

    Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

    Gain insights on how Curtis Begg typically rules on cases like yours

    Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

    Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument