Joseph BeharLTB Paralegal
Stats Updated: August 9, 2026
You might be looking for:
LTB hearings are conducted online. Paralegals can serve clients across Ontario
Contact Information
✓ Joseph Behar is in good standing with the Law Society of Ontario.
0 people revealed this month
0 people revealed this month
163 profile views
Joseph Behar represents both landlords and tenants. The statistics shown below reflect their primary representation (based on total cases).
Performance StatisticsPRO
Statistics are based on available public data and may not be comprehensive.
Other Top Paralegals in Toronto
Win Rate by DisputePRO
Contested disputes only.
- Tenant Agreed Termination5
Win Rate: 80%
- Harassment4
Win Rate: 0%
- Breach Of Conditions2
Win Rate: 100%
- Illegal Entry2
Win Rate: 0%
- Property Damage2
Win Rate: 100%
- Maintenance Issues1
Win Rate: 0%
See Cases by Joseph Behar
Hire paralegals that have won real cases similar to yours.
Identify similar cases to yours for a targeted consultation
Evaluate your chances of winning from precedences
Build trust with verified experience of the paralegal
Need assistance from an expert?
Recent RepresentationPRO
Contested Disputes only. Include cases where representative's name is misspelled or abbreviated
The Tenant withdrew their harassment application against the Landlord at the hearing.
The Landlord was granted an order for rent arrears after the Tenant vacated the unit, following the denial of the Tenant's attempt to raise maintenance issues due to procedural non-compliance.
Limon v McAfee
The LTB terminated the tenancy due to non-payment of rent and excluded the tenant's maintenance claims due to procedural non-compliance.
The Landlord's application to evict for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the claimed rent increase was invalid and the Tenant had paid all lawful rent.
The LTB dismissed a Landlord's application to terminate a tenancy and granted the Tenant a rent abatement for substantial interference regarding the use of a back hallway.
The Landlord's eviction application was dismissed, and the Landlord was ordered to pay rent abatement to the Tenant for interfering with the Tenant's storage in a common area.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a mediated settlement requiring the Landlord to pay $26,500.00 to the Tenant.
Eaglehill Capital Inc. v Omidisahneh
The Landlord's application for termination and rent arrears was granted after the Board found the Tenant failed to properly vacate the unit, awarding the Landlord $30,971.84.
The Tenant withdrew their harassment application against the Landlord at the hearing.
The Landlord was granted an order for rent arrears after the Tenant vacated the unit, following the denial of the Tenant's attempt to raise maintenance issues due to procedural non-compliance.
Limon v McAfee
The LTB terminated the tenancy due to non-payment of rent and excluded the tenant's maintenance claims due to procedural non-compliance.
The Landlord's application to evict for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the claimed rent increase was invalid and the Tenant had paid all lawful rent.
The LTB dismissed a Landlord's application to terminate a tenancy and granted the Tenant a rent abatement for substantial interference regarding the use of a back hallway.
The Landlord's eviction application was dismissed, and the Landlord was ordered to pay rent abatement to the Tenant for interfering with the Tenant's storage in a common area.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a mediated settlement requiring the Landlord to pay $26,500.00 to the Tenant.
Eaglehill Capital Inc. v Omidisahneh
The Landlord's application for termination and rent arrears was granted after the Board found the Tenant failed to properly vacate the unit, awarding the Landlord $30,971.84.
The Tenant withdrew their harassment application against the Landlord at the hearing.
The Landlord was granted an order for rent arrears after the Tenant vacated the unit, following the denial of the Tenant's attempt to raise maintenance issues due to procedural non-compliance.
Limon v McAfee
The LTB terminated the tenancy due to non-payment of rent and excluded the tenant's maintenance claims due to procedural non-compliance.
The Landlord's application to evict for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the claimed rent increase was invalid and the Tenant had paid all lawful rent.
The LTB dismissed a Landlord's application to terminate a tenancy and granted the Tenant a rent abatement for substantial interference regarding the use of a back hallway.
The Landlord's eviction application was dismissed, and the Landlord was ordered to pay rent abatement to the Tenant for interfering with the Tenant's storage in a common area.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a mediated settlement requiring the Landlord to pay $26,500.00 to the Tenant.
Eaglehill Capital Inc. v Omidisahneh
The Landlord's application for termination and rent arrears was granted after the Board found the Tenant failed to properly vacate the unit, awarding the Landlord $30,971.84.
The Tenant withdrew their harassment application against the Landlord at the hearing.
The Landlord was granted an order for rent arrears after the Tenant vacated the unit, following the denial of the Tenant's attempt to raise maintenance issues due to procedural non-compliance.
Limon v McAfee
The LTB terminated the tenancy due to non-payment of rent and excluded the tenant's maintenance claims due to procedural non-compliance.
The Landlord's application to evict for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the claimed rent increase was invalid and the Tenant had paid all lawful rent.
The LTB dismissed a Landlord's application to terminate a tenancy and granted the Tenant a rent abatement for substantial interference regarding the use of a back hallway.
The Landlord's eviction application was dismissed, and the Landlord was ordered to pay rent abatement to the Tenant for interfering with the Tenant's storage in a common area.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a mediated settlement requiring the Landlord to pay $26,500.00 to the Tenant.
Eaglehill Capital Inc. v Omidisahneh
The Landlord's application for termination and rent arrears was granted after the Board found the Tenant failed to properly vacate the unit, awarding the Landlord $30,971.84.
See Cases by Joseph Behar
Hire paralegals that have won real cases similar to yours.
Identify similar cases to yours for a targeted consultation
Evaluate your chances of winning from precedences
Build trust with verified experience of the paralegal
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The Rent Arrears Calculation Maze: How Small Errors Lead to Big Losses at the LTB
Discover how minor calculation mistakes in N4 notices and rent arrears can cost landlords thousands at Ontario's LTB. Learn from real cases and avoid costly errors.
The Rent Increase Rulebook: Understanding Above-Guideline Increases and Capital Expenditure Claims in Ontario
A comprehensive guide to above-guideline rent increases in Ontario, exploring how landlords justify capital expenditure claims, common pitfalls that lead to dismissed applications, and what tenants need to know about challenging these increases.
The Appeal Process Decoded: When and How to Challenge LTB Decisions at the Divisional Court
Navigate the complex world of appealing Landlord and Tenant Board decisions to Ontario's Divisional Court. Learn the strict requirements, common pitfalls, and strategies for successful appeals.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform