Last updated: November 3, 2024
Ordered by Tribunals Ontario under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006
Dispute resolved in
Conditional Agreement
Monies to be paid to Landlord
$186
Agree with the ruling?
Application Date
Jun 2023
Hearing Date
Apr 2024
Order Date
Apr 24, 2024
The Landlord proved the Tenants substantially interfered with the Landlord's reasonable enjoyment by refusing access for showings, but did not prove the Tenants caused undue damage to the premises. The Tenancy is continued on the condition the Tenants allow the Landlord access for showings. If the Tenants breach the condition, the Landlord can apply to terminate the tenancy without notice.
Tenant asked to preserve tenancy, and it would not be unfair to grant conditional relief
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to substantial interference with the Landlord's reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest, and wilful or negligent damage to the premises. The Landlord alleged the Tenants cancelled showings, refused to allow further showings, and caused damage to the hardwood floors.
Landlord alleged Tenant's dogs caused $30,000 in damage to hardwood floors, and Tenant cancelled showings and refused to allow further showings.
Tenant argued it would be difficult to find another rental unit due to current housing market and being unemployed.
Tenant refused to allow Landlord or Landlord's realtor access to rental unit for showings, citing lack of trust and safety concerns.
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Application Fee
$186
Total Amount to Be Paid
$186 (To be paid to Landlord)
Click to switch between order outcomes
Waterloo tenants face eviction for non-payment of $45,500 rent, ordered to pay $36,617.97 to landlord.
Gloucester tenants face eviction for $22,257.05 in unpaid rent, given until January 31, 2025 to vacate.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against tenant who failed to pay $10,805.94 in rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins non-payment case, tenant ordered to pay $10,202.48 or face eviction.
Waterloo tenants face eviction for non-payment of $45,500 rent, ordered to pay $36,617.97 to landlord.
Gloucester tenants face eviction for $22,257.05 in unpaid rent, given until January 31, 2025 to vacate.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against tenant who failed to pay $10,805.94 in rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins non-payment case, tenant ordered to pay $10,202.48 or face eviction.
Waterloo tenants face eviction for non-payment of $45,500 rent, ordered to pay $36,617.97 to landlord.
Gloucester tenants face eviction for $22,257.05 in unpaid rent, given until January 31, 2025 to vacate.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against tenant who failed to pay $10,805.94 in rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins non-payment case, tenant ordered to pay $10,202.48 or face eviction.
Waterloo tenants face eviction for non-payment of $45,500 rent, ordered to pay $36,617.97 to landlord.
Gloucester tenants face eviction for $22,257.05 in unpaid rent, given until January 31, 2025 to vacate.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against tenant who failed to pay $10,805.94 in rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins non-payment case, tenant ordered to pay $10,202.48 or face eviction.
Cornwall landlords win personal use eviction, but tenants granted delayed enforcement due to hardship.
Ontario court dismisses defendant's motion and awards costs to plaintiffs due to procedural failures.
Oshawa co-op member faces eviction for non-payment and persistent late payment of housing charges, owes $14,344.
Toronto tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, given additional time to move out.
