Tripple HHH Inc v Moczo, Horvath - Landlord Wins Eviction Case for Non-payment of Rent
Landlord Tripple HHH Inc wins eviction case against tenants Moczo and Horvath for $13731 in unpaid rent
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 5, 2024
Case Summary
2 Lacey Ave, York, ON M6M3L6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$13,731
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date (Estimate)
Mar 2024
Hearing Date
Sep 2024
Order Date
Oct 1, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Oct 2024
We estimate Application Date using rent arrears.
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the tenants did not void by paying the arrears. The tenants were still in possession of the rental unit on the hearing date.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N4 Notice
- Tenants did not void notice by paying arrears
- Tenants in possession on application date
- Lawful rent is $2,400 due on 1st of each month
- No payments made since application filed
Decision Summary
Unless the Tenants void the order by paying $17,111 on or before October 12, 2024, the tenancy will be terminated. If the Tenants do not void the order, they must pay the Landlord $13,731.20 plus daily compensation of $78.90 starting September 19, 2024 until they vacate the unit.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
70
Landlord Favorable
74.3%
Tenant Favorable
17.1%
Mutual Agreement
8.6%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$2,400
Rent Arrears
$14,400
Application Fee
$186
Other Owed Amount
$125
NSF charges
Total Owing
$13,731 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.