Tremblay v Doyle: Tenancy Continues with Conditions
LTB maintains tenancy with conditions after resolving complex landlord-tenant dispute involving parking and property use
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 14, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 6836 Hwy 93, Wyebridge, ON L0K 2E0
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed to Landlord
$186
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Jun 2024
Order Date
Aug 27, 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for termination of tenancy due to alleged substantial interference, property damage, and multiple breaches of tenancy agreement including parking issues, unauthorized use of bedroom, verbal abuse, and property damage.
Determinations
- Tenant damaged grass by parking outside designated areas
- No clear evidence of serious safety impairment
- No proven substantial damage to stairs or railing
- Denied entry proven for one instance
- Tenancy continues with specific conditions
Case Study
Board found partial merit in Landlord's claims, particularly regarding parking damage, but did not find sufficient evidence for all allegations.
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Actions
Claimed $35,000 in damages without providing evidence
Aggravating Factors
Emotional toll from tenant's behavior
Tenant
Arguments
Willing to comply with conditions, requested delayed eviction
Actions
Parked on grass, installed cameras to monitor vehicle, used upstairs bedroom
Aggravating Factors
Parking on grass, potential obstruction of emergency access
Decision Summary
Tenancy continues subject to conditions of proper parking and providing entry to Landlord. Tenant must pay $186 application fee by September 1, 2024.
Reason for Eviction Relief
Tenant has been in unit since 2019, working part-time, and willing to comply with conditions
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
616
Landlord Favorable
90.9%
Tenant Favorable
5.0%
Mutual Agreement
4.1%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$186
Total Owing
$186 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.