SOUTHGATE-NICHOLLS v BREIRE - Landlord Wins Tenant Rights Dispute
Landlord wins tenant rights dispute in Kitchener, ordered to pay $123 in interest on rent deposit
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
Case Summary
75 Byron Avenue, Kitchener, ON N2C1Z7
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Tenant
$123
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
Oct 2023
Order Date
Nov 3, 2023
Dispute Summary
The Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord entered the rental unit illegally, altered the locking system without providing replacement keys, and harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant. The Tenant also applied for an order determining that the Landlord collected or retained money illegally.
Determinations
- Tenant did not prove allegations in T2 application
- Landlord did not illegally retain rent deposit
- Landlord owes Tenant $69.98 in interest on rent deposit
Case Study
The Tenant did not prove the allegations contained in the T2 application on a balance of probabilities. The Landlord did not illegally retain the Tenant's rent deposit.
Decision Summary
The Tenant's application about Tenant's Rights (T2) is dismissed. The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $122.98, which represents interest owing on the last month's rent deposit ($69.98) and the cost of filing the application ($53.00). If the Landlord does not pay the Tenant the full amount owing by November 28, 2023, the Landlord will owe interest.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
76
Landlord Favorable
86.8%
Tenant Favorable
11.8%
Mutual Agreement
1.3%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$53
Rent Deposit
$1,600
Deposit Interest
$70
Total Owing
$123 (Owed to Tenant)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.