Landlord Wins Termination Case: Savchenko v Greco 2024
Maple landlord wins eviction case against tenant who couldn't afford $4000 rent, faces $21000 in arrears
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 3, 2024
Case Summary
16 Sylwood Cres, Maple, ON L6A2R1
Decision in favor of
landlord
Previous Order
Upheld
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date (Estimate)
Oct 2023
Tenancy End Date
Feb 2024
Hearing Date
Apr 2024
Order Date
May 13, 2024
We estimate Application Date using rent arrears. Tenancy ended before hearing.
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant because the Tenant entered into an agreement to terminate the tenancy. The Tenant filed a motion to set aside the eviction order.
Determinations
- Parties entered into valid agreement to terminate tenancy
- Tenant cannot afford monthly rent of $4,000
- Tenant has not paid rent in full since November 2023
- Tenant has expenses related to children's education
- Tenancy is not financially sustainable
- Landlord experiencing severe financial hardship due to unpaid rent
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Arguments
Tenant made vague references to being 'pressured' into signing agreement.
Actions
Tenant signed agreement to terminate tenancy due to inability to afford rent.
Decision Summary
The Tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order is denied. The stay of the eviction order is lifted immediately. The original eviction order remains unchanged.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
313
Landlord Favorable
82.8%
Tenant Favorable
11.8%
Mutual Agreement
5.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$4,000
Rent Arrears
$21,000
Total Owing
$21,000 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.