Landlord Wins Non-payment Case: Sarkisian v Mullins 2024
Vanier tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $7710 rent, ordered to pay $5938 to landlord
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 27, 2024
Case Summary
148 Montfort Street, Vanier, ON K1L5P6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$5,938
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date (Estimate)
Feb 2024
Hearing Date
Aug 2024
Order Date
Aug 22, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Sep 2024
We estimate Application Date using rent arrears.
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the Tenant did not void by paying the arrears. The Tenant was still in possession of the rental unit on the hearing date.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N4 Notice
- Tenant did not void notice by paying arrears
- Tenant in possession on application date
- Lawful rent due on 1st of each month
- No payments made since application filed
Decision Summary
Unless the Tenant voids the order by paying $7,896 by August 31, 2024 or $9,181 by September 2, 2024, the tenancy will be terminated effective September 2, 2024. If the Tenant does not void the order, the Tenant must pay the Landlord $5,938.19, which includes rent arrears up to the hearing date and the cost of filing the application, minus the rent deposit and interest on the deposit.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
2349
Landlord Favorable
89.5%
Tenant Favorable
0.8%
Mutual Agreement
9.8%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,285
Rent Arrears
$7,710
Application Fee
$186
Rent Deposit
$1,285
Deposit Interest
$22
Total Owing
$5,938 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.