RentZen LogoRentZen
Thanksgiving Sale30% offLimited time offer

Pawlyshyn v D** Thi

Last updated: October 12, 2026

Share:

Order

Order Date: June 23, 2026
Unit ***, 400 THE EAST MALL, ETOBICOKE, ON M9B3Z9
Contested Dispute
Application T2Filed by TenantDocument Order

Dispute resolved in

Agreement

Subsections of RTA Quoted

200(4)
ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue

Citation: Pawlyshyn v D** Thi, LTB-T-098663-25

File Number: LTB-T-098663-25

Timeline

Hearing Date

Jun 2026

5 days

Order Date

Jun 23, 2026

Decision

The Tenant's application was withdrawn with consent at the hearing, and the LTB file was closed.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

The Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex and harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant. At the hearing, the Tenant sought to withdraw the application, and the Landlord did not object.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • The Tenant sought to withdraw the application at the hearing.
  • The Landlord did not object to the withdrawal.
  • The application is withdrawn and the LTB file is closed.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

The Landlord attended the hearing and did not object to the withdrawal of the application.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

The Tenant attended the hearing and sought to withdraw the application.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content
Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Algoma District Services Administration Board v Martel

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB issued an ex parte order terminating a tenancy and ordering eviction after the tenant breached the conditions of a previous order.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionHigh

Smith v Lee

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

Downey-Thomas v Lacson

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Old Oak Properties Inc. v Last

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
London

The Landlord established substantial interference due to excessive communications, but relief from eviction was granted allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionModerate

Algoma District Services Administration Board v Martel

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB issued an ex parte order terminating a tenancy and ordering eviction after the tenant breached the conditions of a previous order.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionHigh

Smith v Lee

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

Downey-Thomas v Lacson

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Old Oak Properties Inc. v Last

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
London

The Landlord established substantial interference due to excessive communications, but relief from eviction was granted allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform