Monteiro v Vieau
Last updated: August 9, 2026
Order
Dispute resolved in
Agreement
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Order PDF provided by the LTB Order Catalogue
Citation: Monteiro v Vieau, LTB-L-048063-23
File Number: LTB-T-063011-23
Timeline
Hearing Date
Feb 2026
Order Date
Feb 10, 2026
Decision
The parties reached a settlement agreement in which the Landlord agrees to pay the Tenants $500.00 to resolve all outstanding claims.
Dispute
Landlord sought damages for utilities and property damage. Tenants sought recovery of illegal charges and remedies for illegal entry/lock changes. The parties reached a settlement during the hearing.
Determinations
Landlord's Arguments
Considerations
Tenant's Arguments
Considerations
Need assistance from an expert?
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request regarding a maintenance order, finding no serious errors in the original proceeding.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.
The LTB found the Landlord delayed in addressing a cockroach infestation, awarding the Tenant hotel expenses and filing fees, but permitted the Landlord to set off these amounts against larger debts owed by the Tenant under prior orders.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request regarding a maintenance order, finding no serious errors in the original proceeding.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.
The LTB found the Landlord delayed in addressing a cockroach infestation, awarding the Tenant hotel expenses and filing fees, but permitted the Landlord to set off these amounts against larger debts owed by the Tenant under prior orders.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request regarding a maintenance order, finding no serious errors in the original proceeding.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.
The LTB found the Landlord delayed in addressing a cockroach infestation, awarding the Tenant hotel expenses and filing fees, but permitted the Landlord to set off these amounts against larger debts owed by the Tenant under prior orders.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request regarding a maintenance order, finding no serious errors in the original proceeding.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.
The LTB found the Landlord delayed in addressing a cockroach infestation, awarding the Tenant hotel expenses and filing fees, but permitted the Landlord to set off these amounts against larger debts owed by the Tenant under prior orders.
C***** Barrientos v Sherritt
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's T2 application for substantial interference, maintenance failures, and harassment after finding the allegations unproven.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The LTB denied the tenant's review request, finding no procedural unfairness or serious error in the original dismissal of the tenant's maintenance and service reduction applications.
Telli v Sterling Karamar Property Management
The Tenant withdrew their maintenance application at the hearing, and the LTB closed the file.
Boucetta v Metcap Living Management Inc.
The tenant's request for review of a maintenance order was dismissed because the adjudicator found no serious error in the original decision.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Do You Need a Lawyer or Paralegal for the LTB? A Cost-Benefit Guide for Ontario Landlords and Tenants
Should you hire a lawyer or paralegal for your Landlord and Tenant Board case? Compare representation costs, LTB fee recovery limits, and when self-representation makes sense for Ontario rental disputes.
Utility Billing Disputes and Illegal Charges: Understanding Your Rights in Ontario's Rental Market
An in-depth analysis of utility billing disputes at Ontario's LTB reveals common overcharging practices, jurisdictional limitations, and the financial consequences for both landlords and tenants when utility agreements go wrong.
Ontario Rental Privacy Guide 2026: PIPEDA, Security Cameras, Tenant Data, and Entry Rules
Ontario landlords and tenants face two privacy frameworks — PIPEDA and the RTA. Learn what data can be collected, where cameras are legal, when photos require consent, and how to respond to violations.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform