Millford Development Limited v Whitmore: Rent Arrears Payment Plan
North Bay tenants granted structured payment plan for $7125 rent arrears
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 14, 2024
Case Summary
5 Packard Cres, North Bay, ON P1B9G5
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$7,125
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date (Estimate)
Feb 2024
Hearing Date
Aug 2024
Order Date
Sep 4, 2024
We estimate Application Date using rent arrears.
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the tenants did not void by paying the arrears.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N4 Notice
- Tenants did not void notice by paying arrears
- Tenants still in possession of rental unit
- Lawful rent is $1,165.94 due on 1st of each month
- No payments made since application filed
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Actions
Landlord's representative presented a payment agreement
Tenant
Actions
Tenants did not pay rent and were absent from the hearing
Decision Summary
Tenants ordered to pay $7,124.69 in rent arrears and costs through a structured payment plan from September 2024 to February 2026, with conditions to pay new rent on time during this period.
Reason for Eviction Relief
Payment plan agreement
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
484
Landlord Favorable
97.1%
Tenant Favorable
0.8%
Mutual Agreement
2.1%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,166
Rent Arrears
$6,939
Application Fee
$186
Rent Deposit
$1,166
Deposit Interest
$9
Total Owing
$7,125 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.