Medallion Corporation v Kehoe - Landlord Wins Rent Arrears Case
Toronto landlord wins $6043 in rent arrears case against tenant Jeannelle M Kehoe
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 13, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 2 Vena Way, Toronto, ON M9M0G5
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$3,024
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date (Estimate)
Dec 2023
Hearing Date
Feb 2024
Order Date
Feb 27, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Apr 2024
We estimate Application Date using rent arrears.
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to non-payment of rent. The Landlord also claimed charges related to NSF cheques.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N4 Notice
- Tenant did not void notice by paying arrears
- Tenant still in possession on hearing date
- Lawful rent is $2,647.57 per month
- Tenant paid $9,695 since application filed
- Rent arrears owing to 2024-02-29 are $5,802
- Landlord entitled to $40 for NSF charges
- Landlord entitled to $201 for filing fee
- Tenant paid $2,570.45 rent deposit
- Interest on rent deposit is $63.91
Decision Summary
The tenancy is terminated unless the Tenant voids the order by paying the outstanding amount by the specified deadlines. If the Tenant does not void the order, the Tenant must vacate the unit by April 30, 2024 and pay the Landlord the remaining amount owing.
Reason for Eviction Relief
Postpone eviction until April 30, 2024
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
190
Landlord Favorable
93.2%
Tenant Favorable
4.2%
Mutual Agreement
2.6%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$2,648
Rent Arrears
$5,802
Application Fee
$201
Rent Deposit
$2,570
Deposit Interest
$64
Other Owed Amount
$40
NSF charges
Total Owing
$3,024 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.