Landlord Wins Personal Use Case: Mcneil v Mcneil 2024
Landlord wins personal use case, Tenant faces eviction in Magnetawan
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 3, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 100 Sparks St, Magnetawan, ON P0A1P0
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Jan 2024
Hearing Date
May 2024
Order Date
Jun 26, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Jul 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant because the Landlord in good faith requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation for at least one year.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N12 Notice
- Landlord in good faith requires unit for own residential occupation for at least one year
- Landlord provided one month's rent compensation to Tenant
- No last month's rent deposit
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Actions
Landlord testified that the unit is a 1,000 square foot 2-storey home and he currently lives in a trailer which is approximately 200 square feet and intends to move into the unit as a means to increase his quality of life. The Landlord further testified he intends to occupy the unit for a period of at least one year.
Decision Summary
The Landlord has proven on a balance of probabilities the grounds for termination of the tenancy under section 48(1)(a) of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006. The tenancy is terminated as of July 7, 2024. The Landlord has provided the required one month's rent compensation to the Tenant.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
226
Landlord Favorable
96.0%
Tenant Favorable
3.1%
Mutual Agreement
0.9%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,500
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.