Tenant Evicted for Extreme Uncleanliness: Kipps Lane v Carrano 2024
London tenant evicted for extreme uncleanliness and repeated pest inspection refusals
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 14, 2024
Case Summary
19 Rosemary Walk, London, ON N5Y2H6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Aug 2024
Order Date
Aug 29, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Sep 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy due to tenant's substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment, including repeated refusal of entry for pest inspections and failure to maintain unit cleanliness.
Determinations
- Tenant refused multiple pest inspection entries
- Unit was in extreme uncleanliness
- Cockroach infestation present
- Tenant did not void N5 notice
- Substantial interference with landlord's rights
Case Study
Tenant failed to void N5 notice within seven-day period by not correcting cleanliness issues and repeatedly refusing entry for pest inspections.
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Actions
Attempted multiple pest inspections, documented unit's poor condition with photographs
Tenant
Actions
Repeatedly refused pest inspections, unit was extremely unclean with feces, urine, and cockroach infestation
Decision Summary
Tenancy terminated due to substantial interference, including repeated refusal of pest inspections and failure to maintain unit cleanliness. Tenant must vacate by September 9, 2024.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
36
Landlord Favorable
66.7%
Tenant Favorable
27.8%
Mutual Agreement
5.6%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$186
Rent Deposit
$1,377
Deposit Interest
$19
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.