Hefley v Miclash
Last updated: October 12, 2026
Order
Dispute resolved in
Agreement
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue
Citation: Hefley v Miclash, LTB-T-045159-26
File Number: LTB-T-045159-26
Timeline
Order Date
Jul 31, 2026
Decision
The Tenant's T2 and T6 applications were withdrawn upon request following a mutual agreement between the parties, and the LTB file was closed.
Dispute
The Tenant applied for orders determining that the Landlord entered the rental unit illegally, substantially interfered with reasonable enjoyment, harassed the Tenant, and failed to meet maintenance obligations. The applications were withdrawn following a mutual agreement between the parties.
Determinations
- On July 27, 2026, the Tenant submitted a request to withdraw their T2 and T6 applications.
- The Tenant stated a mutual agreement was reached with the Landlord and they no longer wish to proceed.
- The adjudicator consented to the withdrawal of the applications pursuant to subsection 200(4) of the Act.
Landlord's Arguments
Considerations
Tenant's Arguments
Actions and Evidence
The Tenant submitted a request to withdraw the T2 and T6 applications after reaching a mutual agreement with the Landlord.
Considerations
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
Algoma District Services Administration Board v Martel
The LTB issued an ex parte order terminating a tenancy and ordering eviction after the tenant breached the conditions of a previous order.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request regarding a maintenance order, finding no serious errors in the original proceeding.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.
Algoma District Services Administration Board v Martel
The LTB issued an ex parte order terminating a tenancy and ordering eviction after the tenant breached the conditions of a previous order.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request regarding a maintenance order, finding no serious errors in the original proceeding.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.
Algoma District Services Administration Board v Martel
The LTB issued an ex parte order terminating a tenancy and ordering eviction after the tenant breached the conditions of a previous order.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request regarding a maintenance order, finding no serious errors in the original proceeding.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.
Algoma District Services Administration Board v Martel
The LTB issued an ex parte order terminating a tenancy and ordering eviction after the tenant breached the conditions of a previous order.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request regarding a maintenance order, finding no serious errors in the original proceeding.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Old Oak Properties Inc. v Last
The Landlord established substantial interference due to excessive communications, but relief from eviction was granted allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions.
Twaseen v Zhang
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.
The LTB found the Landlord delayed in addressing a cockroach infestation, awarding the Tenant hotel expenses and filing fees, but permitted the Landlord to set off these amounts against larger debts owed by the Tenant under prior orders.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The Appeal Process Decoded: When and How to Challenge LTB Decisions at the Divisional Court
Navigate the complex world of appealing Landlord and Tenant Board decisions to Ontario's Divisional Court. Learn the strict requirements, common pitfalls, and strategies for successful appeals.
The N8 Notice Deep Dive: Persistent Late Payment and How It Differs from Non-Payment Cases in Ontario
Understanding the critical differences between N4 and N8 notices, common pitfalls that invalidate N8 notices, and the unique legal standards for persistent late payment cases.
Top Tenant Mistakes in LTB Applications (And How to Avoid Them)
Learn from real LTB cases why tenant applications fail. Discover the most common mistakes that lead to dismissed applications and practical strategies to strengthen your case and protect your rights as a tenant.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform