Greater Sudbury Housing Corporation v Lalande - 2024 LTB Ruling
Sudbury tenant ordered to pay $9522 or face eviction for non-payment of rent
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 13, 2024
Case Summary
605 Lasalle Blvd, Sudbury, ON P3A2G5
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$9,522
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2023
Hearing Date
Mar 2024
Order Date
Apr 9, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Apr 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the Tenant did not void by paying the arrears. The Tenant was still in possession of the rental unit on the hearing date.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N4 Notice
- Tenant did not void notice by paying arrears
- Tenant in possession on application date
- Lawful rent due on 1st of each month
- No payments made since application filed
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Actions
Tenant testified that they do not wish to preserve the tenancy and would require two weeks to vacate the rental unit.
Decision Summary
Unless the Tenant voids the order by paying $10,978 on or before April 20, 2024, the tenancy will be terminated. If the Tenant does not void the order, the Tenant must pay the Landlord $9,521.80 and compensation of $44.35 per day starting March 29, 2024 until the Tenant vacates the unit.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
20
Landlord Favorable
95.0%
Tenant Favorable
5.0%
Mutual Agreement
0.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,349
Rent Arrears
$9,443
Application Fee
$186
Total Owing
$9,522 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.