Eplco Realty Group Ltd. v Vuletic
Last updated: October 13, 2024
Order
Ordered by Candace Aboussafy,Tribunals Ontario under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006
Decision in favor of
Tenant
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Citation: Eplco Realty Group Ltd. v Vuletic, 2024 ONLTB 10867
File Number: LTB-L-035223-23
Timeline
Application Date
Apr 2023
Hearing Date
Jan 2024
Order Date
Feb 13, 2024
Decision
Landlord's application is dismissed. Landlord failed to prove grounds for termination of tenancy.
Reason for Eviction Relief
Yelling and screaming related to Tenant's disability
Dispute
Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant, and for committing an illegal act.
Determinations
- Landlord has not proven grounds for termination of tenancy
- Tenants had consent from Landlord to have dog off-leash
- Landlord failed to investigate source of marijuana smoke
- Landlord failed to investigate source of excessive noise
- Yelling and screaming related to Tenant's disability
Landlord's Arguments
Procedural Errors
Landlord failed to investigate source of marijuana smoke and excessive noise
Tenant's Arguments
Actions and Evidence
Tenants had their dog off-leash with Landlord's consent.
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios
The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.
Algoma District Services Administration Board v Martel
The LTB issued an ex parte order terminating a tenancy and ordering eviction after the tenant breached the conditions of a previous order.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios
The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.
Algoma District Services Administration Board v Martel
The LTB issued an ex parte order terminating a tenancy and ordering eviction after the tenant breached the conditions of a previous order.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios
The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.
Algoma District Services Administration Board v Martel
The LTB issued an ex parte order terminating a tenancy and ordering eviction after the tenant breached the conditions of a previous order.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios
The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.
Algoma District Services Administration Board v Martel
The LTB issued an ex parte order terminating a tenancy and ordering eviction after the tenant breached the conditions of a previous order.
Smith v Lee
An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Old Oak Properties Inc. v Last
The Landlord established substantial interference due to excessive communications, but relief from eviction was granted allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions.
Twaseen v Zhang
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.
C***** Barrientos v Sherritt
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's T2 application for substantial interference, maintenance failures, and harassment after finding the allegations unproven.
Celik v Celik
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application because the Residential Tenancies Act did not apply due to the shared use of kitchen and bathroom facilities with the landlord and the landlord's mother.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
London, Ontario Tenant Paralegals: How to Find LTB Representation and Defend Your Rights (2026)
Facing eviction or landlord harassment in London, Ontario? Learn what tenant paralegals do at the LTB, when to hire one, and meet Southwestern Ontario advocates ranked by real tribunal records.
Judicial Review of LTB Orders in Ontario: How to Challenge a Board Decision After Yatar (2026 Guide)
Lost at the Landlord and Tenant Board? Ontario's 2024 Yatar ruling confirms a third path beyond LTB review and Divisional Court appeal. Learn when judicial review fits, how to file Form 68A, deadlines, stays, and the reasonableness standard.
Ontario Bill 60 Explained: LTB Rule Changes for Landlords and Tenants (2026 Guide)
Bill 60 amends Ontario's Residential Tenancies Act to speed up LTB cases. Learn what changed — N4 timelines, section 82 pay-in rules, N12 compensation, review deadlines — and which provisions are in force as of May 2026.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform