RentZen LogoRentZen
Thanksgiving Sale30% offLimited time offer

Drewlo Holdings Inc. v Zhang

Last updated: October 12, 2026

Share:

Order

Order Date: June 9, 2026
Unit ***, 50 CAPULET LANE, LONDON, ON N6H0B1
Contested Dispute
Application L10Filed by LandlordDocument Order

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Dispute Categories

Subsections of RTA Quoted

89 (1)89 (1.1)
ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue

Citation: Drewlo Holdings Inc. v Zhang, 2026 ONLTB 44425, LTB-L-019294-25

File Number: LTB-L-019294-25

Timeline

Application Date

Mar 2025

15 months

Hearing Date

Jun 2026

7 days

Order Date

Jun 9, 2026

Decision

The Landlord's application for compensation for damage to property under section 89 of the Act was granted. The Former Tenants were ordered to pay $1,506.07 for carpet replacement and the application filing fee.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

The Landlord applied for an order requiring the Former Tenants to pay reasonable out-of-pocket costs to repair or replace undue damage to property caused wilfully or negligently.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • The Landlord proved the allegations contained in the application on a balance of probabilities and the reasonable costs incurred to repair and replace damaged property.
  • The Former Tenants shall pay the Landlord $1,506.07 on or before June 20, 2026.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Landlord submitted documentary evidence of the carpet state at move-in and move-out, invoices for replacement, and testified that the carpet required complete replacement due to undue damage.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Tenant testified that the documentary evidence provided was not that of the Former Tenants' rental unit, alleged the Former Tenants had left the rental unit vacant, did not soil or damage the carpet, and had cleaned their carpet as requested by the Landlord and/or its Agents.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content
Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Tang v Singh

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 30, 2026
MISSISSAUGA
Review Order

The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenants' review request, confirming the original order requiring the Tenants to pay for property damage and filing fees.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Lam v 1000768931 Ontario Corporation

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay for property damage and application fees, offset by excess rent deposit held by the Landlord.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Godson

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction due to substantial interference, property damage, and safety impairment, while granting a delayed eviction date under s. 83(1)(b).

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionExtreme

Valdez v Curtis and Dunn

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 29, 2026
WINGHAM

An LTB adjudicator ordered the Tenants to pay $442.86 for unpaid utilities and the application fee, while dismissing the Landlord's property damage claim due to insufficient evidence.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

Tang v Singh

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 30, 2026
MISSISSAUGA
Review Order

The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenants' review request, confirming the original order requiring the Tenants to pay for property damage and filing fees.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Lam v 1000768931 Ontario Corporation

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay for property damage and application fees, offset by excess rent deposit held by the Landlord.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Godson

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction due to substantial interference, property damage, and safety impairment, while granting a delayed eviction date under s. 83(1)(b).

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionExtreme

Valdez v Curtis and Dunn

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 29, 2026
WINGHAM

An LTB adjudicator ordered the Tenants to pay $442.86 for unpaid utilities and the application fee, while dismissing the Landlord's property damage claim due to insufficient evidence.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform