Tang v Singh
Last updated: October 12, 2026
Order
Decision in favor of
Landlord
Previous Order
Upheld
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Order PDF provided by the LTB Order Catalogue
Citation: Tang v Singh, LTB-L-051195-25-RV
File Number: LTB-L-051195-25
Timeline
Order Date
Jul 30, 2026
Decision
The Tenants' request to review order LTB-L-051195-25 is denied. The original order is confirmed and remains unchanged.
Dispute
The Tenants requested a review of an order that required them to pay costs for damage to a kitchen countertop and the application filing fee. The review Member determined there was no serious error in the original order and denied the review request.
Determinations
- The original order required the Former Tenants to pay $2,260.00 for a damaged kitchen countertop and $186.00 for the filing fee.
- The review request asserts a serious error, but no serious error or improper assessment of evidence was found.
- The Member's findings regarding damage beyond normal wear and tear are entitled to considerable deference.
- The claim for overpayment of utility charges was properly excluded as it was the subject of a separate application (LTB-T-046127-25).
- The review request is denied in the absence of a demonstrable error.
Landlord's Arguments
Considerations
Tenant's Arguments
Arguments
The Tenants argued that the original order contained a serious error regarding the kitchen countertop damage assessment and failed to address their claim for overpayment of utility charges.
Actions and Evidence
The Tenants requested a review of the original order, asserting a serious error regarding damage to the kitchen countertop and claims for utility overpayments.
Considerations
Need assistance from an expert?
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
Lam v 1000768931 Ontario Corporation
The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay for property damage and application fees, offset by excess rent deposit held by the Landlord.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Godson
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction due to substantial interference, property damage, and safety impairment, while granting a delayed eviction date under s. 83(1)(b).
Valdez v Curtis and Dunn
An LTB adjudicator ordered the Tenants to pay $442.86 for unpaid utilities and the application fee, while dismissing the Landlord's property damage claim due to insufficient evidence.
The LTB ordered former tenants to pay $688.40 in damage compensation and filing fees for negligently damaging a microwave and unauthorized lock replacement.
Lam v 1000768931 Ontario Corporation
The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay for property damage and application fees, offset by excess rent deposit held by the Landlord.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Godson
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction due to substantial interference, property damage, and safety impairment, while granting a delayed eviction date under s. 83(1)(b).
Valdez v Curtis and Dunn
An LTB adjudicator ordered the Tenants to pay $442.86 for unpaid utilities and the application fee, while dismissing the Landlord's property damage claim due to insufficient evidence.
The LTB ordered former tenants to pay $688.40 in damage compensation and filing fees for negligently damaging a microwave and unauthorized lock replacement.
Lam v 1000768931 Ontario Corporation
The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay for property damage and application fees, offset by excess rent deposit held by the Landlord.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Godson
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction due to substantial interference, property damage, and safety impairment, while granting a delayed eviction date under s. 83(1)(b).
Valdez v Curtis and Dunn
An LTB adjudicator ordered the Tenants to pay $442.86 for unpaid utilities and the application fee, while dismissing the Landlord's property damage claim due to insufficient evidence.
The LTB ordered former tenants to pay $688.40 in damage compensation and filing fees for negligently damaging a microwave and unauthorized lock replacement.
Lam v 1000768931 Ontario Corporation
The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay for property damage and application fees, offset by excess rent deposit held by the Landlord.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Godson
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction due to substantial interference, property damage, and safety impairment, while granting a delayed eviction date under s. 83(1)(b).
Valdez v Curtis and Dunn
An LTB adjudicator ordered the Tenants to pay $442.86 for unpaid utilities and the application fee, while dismissing the Landlord's property damage claim due to insufficient evidence.
The LTB ordered former tenants to pay $688.40 in damage compensation and filing fees for negligently damaging a microwave and unauthorized lock replacement.
Hofberg Holdings Limited v Fuller
The LTB ordered the former tenant to pay the landlord $3,012.99 for property damage and rent arrears.
Gilmour v Donkersgoed
An LTB adjudicator terminated a residential tenancy because the tenant's guests repeatedly attended the property wearing ski masks, causing genuine fear, anxiety, and night terrors for the landlord and her young children.
Farmin v Rodriguez
The Landlord and Tenant Board granted a review order terminating the tenancy for property damage and ordering the tenant to pay repair compensation, while postponing the eviction date.
An LTB order required former tenants to pay the landlord $7,376.00 for property damage and application filing fees.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
How to Enforce an LTB Eviction Order in Ontario: Sheriff Process, Stays, and Lockout Day
Won at the LTB but the tenant won't leave? Learn how Ontario landlords enforce eviction orders through the Sheriff, what happens on lockout day, daily compensation rules, and how tenant stays can delay enforcement.
Ottawa LTB Paralegals for Landlords: How to Find the Right Legal Help (2026 Guide)
Need a landlord paralegal in Ottawa? Learn what licensed paralegals do at the LTB, how they help with evictions and rent arrears, and meet National Capital Region professionals ranked by real case records.
The N5 Notice Filing Guide: Avoiding Critical Errors That Doom Substantial Interference Cases in Ontario
Master the N5 Notice to End Tenancy for Substantial Interference with this comprehensive guide covering proper completion, timing requirements, and costly mistakes that lead to dismissed applications at the LTB.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform