Burk's Falls Investment Corp. v Patey - LTB Allows Landlord to Terminate Tenancy for Major Repairs
LTB allows Burk's Falls landlord to terminate tenancy to complete major repairs and renovations
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 13, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 149 Queen St, Burks Falls, ON P0A1C0
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Feb 2024
Hearing Date
Aug 2024
Order Date
Aug 27, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Sep 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant because the Landlord requires vacant possession of the rental unit in order to do major repairs or renovations to the unit.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N13 Notice
- Landlord intends to do major repairs and renovations in good faith
- Landlord has taken reasonable steps to obtain necessary permits
- Landlord paid required compensation to Tenant
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Actions
The Landlord Representative testified that the company purchased the 12-unit building in November 2022 and the building and all of the units were in a state of disrepair and required extensive renovation. Repairs were ordered by the Burk's Falls Fire Department as the residential complex contains numerous fire safety issues and is not up to code.
Decision Summary
The Landlord has proven the grounds for termination of the tenancy. The tenancy is terminated effective September 7, 2024. If the unit is not vacated by that date, the Landlord may file the order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) for enforcement.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
70
Landlord Favorable
74.3%
Tenant Favorable
17.1%
Mutual Agreement
8.6%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.