Landlord and Tenant Agree to Terminate Tenancy: Al-Abedy v Swinburk 2023
Landlord and tenants in East Gwillimbury agree to terminate tenancy for personal use
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
Case Summary
155 Jim Mortson Dr, East Gwillimbury, ON L9N0Y9
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed
$0
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
May 2023
Tenancy End Date
Jun 2023
Order Date
Jun 7, 2023
Dispute Summary
The landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants because the landlord in good faith requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation for at least one year.
Determinations
- Parties requested termination of tenancy on consent
- Tenancy to be terminated effective June 3, 2023
- Tenants to pay daily compensation of $92.05 starting May 29, 2023 until move-out date
- Last month's rent deposit already applied for April 29 to May 28, 2023
Case Study
The parties requested a final non-voidable termination of the tenancy based on their agreement to terminate the tenancy as of June 3, 2023. The parties also consented to daily compensation based on the monthly rent amount until the date the tenants vacate the rental unit.
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the landlord and the tenants is terminated. The tenants must move out of the rental unit on or before June 3, 2023. If the unit is not vacated by that date, the landlord may file the order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) for enforcement. The tenants shall also pay the landlord compensation of $92.05 per day for the use of the unit starting May 29, 2023 until the date the tenants move out.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
536
Landlord Favorable
91.2%
Tenant Favorable
5.4%
Mutual Agreement
3.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$2,800
Rent Deposit
$2,800
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.