Aiderbrook Management Inc. v Palchok

Last updated: January 12, 2025

Order

Ordered by Ender Joseph,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act, 2006

Order Date: November 12, 2024
Unit ***, 2355 Lake Shore Blvd W, Etobicoke, ON M8V1C1
Contested Dispute

Dispute resolved in

Agreement

Notices Sent

Persistent late payment (N8)Non-payment of rent (N4)

Subsections of RTA Quoted

83(1)(a)83(2)204(1)78
ContentionModerate

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Aiderbrook Management Inc. v Palchok, 2024 ONLTB 81163

File Number: LTB-L-059271-24

Timeline

Hearing Date

Oct 2024

20 days

Order Date

Nov 12, 2024

Decision

The Landlord's application for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant based on rent arrears is discontinued. The tenancy continues if the Tenant pays the rent on time going forward. If the Tenant fails to comply with the conditions, the Landlord may apply to terminate the tenancy.

Unlock Order Content

Reason for Eviction Relief

Tenant can easily remedy the situation and preserve their tenancy, and this is the first application brought on this ground by the Landlord

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to non-payment of rent and persistent late payment of rent. The Tenant paid all rent arrears prior to the hearing, but the Landlord continued with the application for persistent late payment.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Tenant paid all rent arrears prior to hearing
  • Landlord served valid N8 notice for persistent late payment
  • Tenant did not dispute late payments
  • Tenant has been persistently late in paying rent
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord's Agent sought a termination of the Tenancy due to the continued late payments of the rent.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord's Agent testified that they objected to late payments by serving five N4 Notices to Tenant regarding the issue of late payment, prior to the service of the N8 notice.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant requested relief from eviction as he lives with his two children and does not want to be displaced. He testified that he is employed full-time and has a total monthly income of $4000, which is sufficient to pay the rent of $1486.25 and cover other expenses.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant submitted that he has been late on paying rent due to his obligation to pay his credit card bill on the same date.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Shakori v Frolov

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 22, 2026
Etobicoke

Etobicoke landlord wins $41,000 judgment after Board rules a $1.42 error does not invalidate an eviction notice.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionExtreme

ZHANG v CALVILLO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB denies tenants' review request after finding no error in the original eviction order despite tenants' claims of hardship and rent waivers.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

MA v MACHADO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
North York

Landlord granted eviction for $22,341 in arrears, but LTB delays move-out date due to tenant's recent heart surgery.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Nan v Christie

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Markham

Markham tenants granted a chance to stay in their home by paying over $13,000 in arrears under a consent agreement.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Shakori v Frolov

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 22, 2026
Etobicoke

Etobicoke landlord wins $41,000 judgment after Board rules a $1.42 error does not invalidate an eviction notice.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionExtreme

ZHANG v CALVILLO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB denies tenants' review request after finding no error in the original eviction order despite tenants' claims of hardship and rent waivers.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

MA v MACHADO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
North York

Landlord granted eviction for $22,341 in arrears, but LTB delays move-out date due to tenant's recent heart surgery.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Nan v Christie

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Markham

Markham tenants granted a chance to stay in their home by paying over $13,000 in arrears under a consent agreement.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform