Massive Rent Arrears: Stravato v Vertou 2024 LTB Case
Oshawa tenant faces potential eviction for $42160 in unpaid rent
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 14, 2024
Case Summary
292 King Street East, Oshawa, ON L1H1C9
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$35,186
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date (Estimate)
Feb 2023
Hearing Date
May 2024
Order Date
Jun 4, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Jun 2024
We estimate Application Date using rent arrears.
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to significant rent arrears. Tenant did not void the N4 Notice and was absent from the hearing.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N4 Notice
- Tenant did not void notice by paying arrears
- Tenant still in possession of rental unit
- Lawful rent is $2,700.00 per month
- Tenant paid $12,100.00 since application filed
- Rent arrears exceed Board's monetary jurisdiction
Case Study
The Board cannot order more than $35,000, but the full arrears must be paid to void the order and continue tenancy.
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Actions
Landlord filed application for non-payment of rent
Tenant
Actions
Tenant did not respond to N4 Notice or attend hearing
Decision Summary
Unless the Tenant pays $45,061.00 by June 15, 2024, the tenancy will be terminated. The Tenant must vacate the unit by June 15, 2024, or face eviction.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
12
Landlord Favorable
91.7%
Tenant Favorable
8.3%
Mutual Agreement
0.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$2,700
Rent Arrears
$42,160
Application Fee
$201
Rent Deposit
$2,700
Deposit Interest
$184
Total Owing
$35,186 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.