Landlords Win Personal Use Case: Sereguina v Topash 2024
Landlords regain possession of East Gwillimbury rental unit for personal use, tenants must vacate by June 2024
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 6, 2024
Case Summary
154 Countryman Rd, East Gwillimbury, ON L9N0N8
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
Nov 2023
Order Date
Mar 8, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Jun 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants because the Landlords in good faith require possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation for at least one year. The Tenants also applied for an order determining that the Landlords entered the rental unit illegally, substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex, and harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenants.
Determinations
- Landlords served valid N12 notice
- Landlords compensated Tenants one month's rent
- Landlords have genuine intent to move into rental unit
- Tenants were in possession on application date
- Landlords did not substantially interfere or harass Tenants
- Tenants' application dismissed
Case Study
The Landlords have proven on a balance of probabilities the grounds for termination of the tenancy. The Tenants did not prove the allegations contained in their application on a balance of probabilities.
Decision Summary
The tenancy is terminated effective June 30, 2024. The Tenants' application is dismissed.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
376
Landlord Favorable
94.7%
Tenant Favorable
1.9%
Mutual Agreement
3.5%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Rent Deposit
$2,500
Deposit Interest
$89
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.